Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This paper is a retrospective study of 100 sequentially selected cases of colorectal carcinoma treated at The Roosevelt Hospital between 1978 and 1983. In 44 of these patients, the admitting physical digital rectal examination was hemoccult-negative (HN). This group of patients showed no significant difference in tumor location, stage, size, or in presenting symptoms when compared with the 56 patients who were found to be hemoccult-positive (HP). It is concluded that a negative stool hemoccult examination should not alter the course of the patient's work-up if any suspicion of colorectal carcinoma exists. Furthermore, hemoccult sensitivity does not appear to be affected by the size, location or Dukes' classification of a colorectal neoplasm.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02553937 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!