A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Detection of coronary artery disease in aortic stenosis by exercise gated nuclear angiography. | LitMetric

Because the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the presence of aortic stenosis (AS) is difficult, the value of exercise gated nuclear angiography in detecting CAD in 33 patients with AS was assessed. Exercise left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and wall motion analysis were evaluated after symptom-limited supine cycle ergometer exercise. Sixteen patients had severe AS (valve area 0.8 cm2 or less). Thirteen had significant associated CAD (50% or greater reduction in luminal diameter of 1 major coronary artery). Twenty patients had normal coronary arteriograms. All 10 patients with mild to moderate AS and normal coronary arteries had normal nuclear studies. Patients with CAD, regardless of the severity of AS, had a decrease in LVEF during exercise (12 of 13 patients) and regional wall motion abnormalities (11 of 13 patients). Abnormal exercise gated nuclear ventriculographic studies occurred in the absence of CAD in 10 of 20 patients, and all had severe AS (mean aortic valve area 0.8 cm2 or less, range 0.4 to 0.8). Ten had an abnormal LVEF response to exercise and 7 had exercise-induced abnormal wall motion. These findings suggest that the presence of an abnormal LVEF, whether in conjunction with an abnormal wall motion analysis, is indicative of further invasive evaluation; conversely, in those patients with a normal response of LVEF and normal wall motion during exertion, invasive studies may be safely deferred.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(84)80209-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wall motion
20
coronary artery
12
exercise gated
12
gated nuclear
12
patients
9
artery disease
8
aortic stenosis
8
nuclear angiography
8
cad patients
8
motion analysis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!