Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Between 1968 and 1973, 2122 women were sterilised, 52.2% were by laparotomy, 46.3% by laparoscopy. Sterilisation was performed after abortion in 38.5%, after delivery in 22.5%, and as an interval procedure in 38.5% of cases. Laparoscopy had a lower incidence of side effects than laparotomy, and sterilisation as an interval procedure was safer than after delivery or abortion. A five-year follow-up of patients revealed a low incidence of late side effects; only 34 patients required hysterectomy and in 18 this was not due to the sterilisation. Failure of sterilisation (0.5%) was evenly distributed between the various methods; operative trauma was low 0.6% for laparoscopy and 0.2% for laparotomy. There were 4 maternal deaths, only 2 were related to the procedure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0010-7824(80)80008-4 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!