Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The risks of drug contamination after transfer manipulations between vials used in admixture preparations were estimated. The transfers were performed inside a safety cabinet using sodium pertechnetate 99Tcm in saline as a 'model' admixture. An air contamination monitor was attached to the safety cabinet above the transfer manipulation area. The monitor filter and all utensils used were collected for measurement of contamination levels in each sample trial. Three types of transfer were performed; one 'open' procedure and two 'closed' procedures, one including an air vent needle in the receiving vial and the other without air vent needle in the receiving vial. The closed procedure including an air vent needle appears to combine good personnel- and product protection.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.1983.tb01102.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!