Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Theophylline, pentoxifylline and MIX (isobutyl methylxanthine) increase the water permeability of frog urinary bladder when added to the serosal side of the epithelium; this hydrosmotic effect is explained by an inhibition of adenylate cyclase. Both pentoxifylline and MIX exhibit an higher biological activity than theophylline. In contrast to theophylline, pentoxifylline and MIX stimulate the water permeability when added to the mucosal side of the epithelium; this probably results from a better penetration of these drugs into cells.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365518109097498 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!