A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The mechanism of interferon effect on cell transformation by murine sarcoma virus. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Mouse interferon (IFN) inhibits the transformation of normal rat kidney cells by the murine sarcoma virus (MSV) without being toxic to the MSV-transformed cells.
  • IFN affects the viral process by delaying the synthesis and nuclear transport of viral DNA, leading to less integration into the host cell genome.
  • The inhibition of viral DNA supercoiling by IFN is thought to be a key factor preventing integration and subsequent cell transformation.

Article Abstract

Mouse interferon (IFN) was found to inhibit murine sarcoma virus (MSV)-induced neoplastic transformation of normal rat kidney (NRK) cells. This effect was observed upon examining the formation of foci of morphologically altered cells and colonies of anchorage-independent cells. IFN had no cytotoxic effect on MSV-transformed NRK cells, nor on their focus or colony-forming ability. It was therefore apparent that its inhibitory effect was directed against the viral role in cell transformation. In attempts to define the mechanism of this effect, we found that IFN delayed the initiation of the cytoplasmic viral DNA synthesis. However, the amount of this DNA eventually formed in IFN-treated cells was the same as in the control cells. Furthermore, the transport of this DNA to the nucleus was slower in IFN-treated cells, although all of it was finally transferred. However, while most of the viral DNA integrated into the genome of the control cells, very little integration occurred in IFN-treated cells. The unintegrated viral DNA of these cells was slowly degraded. Therefore, if the cells recovered from the antiviral effect of IFN when intact viral DNA molecules still existed in their nucleus, they could resume viral DNA integration and cell transformation. IFN was found to block viral DNA supercoiling. Since supercoiled viral DNA is considered to be a precursor to integrated provirus, it seems that the inhibition of both integration and cell transformation is due to this impaired coiling.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910310611DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

viral dna
28
cell transformation
16
ifn-treated cells
12
cells
11
dna
9
murine sarcoma
8
sarcoma virus
8
nrk cells
8
viral
8
control cells
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!