Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A special multi-electrode derivation of the EEG signal was recently described by Hjorth (1975b). It is more selective than bipolar and common average reference derivations and is called source derivation. The present study aimed at testing the new method in routine EEG work and comparing the results with these obtained with conventional recording technique. EEGs were simultaneously recorded with the two techniques and visual and quantitative comparisons were made in 80 and 30 cases, respectively. Only in one EEG out of 80 was an abnormality detected in source, but not in conventional, derivations. In 25% of the records, however, focal abnormalities were somewhat more pronounced or epileptogenic potentials were sharper in source, than in conventional, derivations. It is concluded that the source derivation technique facilitates EEG interpretation in a significant number of cases.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(80)90156-x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!