AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Seventy-three agoraphobic women rated unsuitable for insight-oriented psychotherapy, entered one of four randomly assigned types of treatment for 3 months. All patients received basal therapy in the form of standardized information, self-exposure instructions and anxiolytic medication. One group received this treatment only at monthly appointments (B). The others, in addition, received either therapist-directed prolonged exposure in vivo (PE), dynamically oriented supportive therapy (ST) or relaxation therapy (R). There was a 9-month follow-up period. All groups were about equally improved at the termination of treatment, with some advantage for PE and ST. At follow-up the ST group was more improved than the other groups, R was least improved, and PE showed some deterioration between the termination of treatment and the follow-up. ST, which took into account the overall adjustment as well as the symptoms, was thus the most successful treatment, but the superiority of the treatment did not manifest itself until at the end of the follow-up period.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1984.tb01176.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

agoraphobic women
8
insight-oriented psychotherapy
8
follow-up period
8
termination treatment
8
treatment
6
effects treatment
4
treatment methods
4
methods agoraphobic
4
women suitable
4
suitable insight-oriented
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!