Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
One hundred thirty-one new hydrophilic lenses made by 3 manufacturers were randomly selected from an optometry clinic for measurement and inspection. Approximately 60% of the base-curve specifications fell within the following ranges for the measured dimensions: Bausch & Lomb Soflens contact lenses, less than 0.150 mm; Milton Roy Naturvue lenses, less than 0.375 mm; Soft Lens Inc. Hydrocurve, less than 0.225 mm. More than 65% of the lenses supplied by all the manufactures were within 0.25 D of the power specification. About two-thirds or more of all lenses had a central thickness and overall diameter within 0.04 mm and 0.40 mm, respectively, of the manufacturers' specifications, although there were notable differences among manufacturers. Most of these new lenses exhibited surface scratches and other surface defects, and many lenses had edge defects.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197712000-00002 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!