Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The effect of the central analgetic, fentanyl, on evoked potentials and Purkinje cells discharges in the cerbellar cortex to stimulation either the cerebral cortex or somatic nerves were studied in nonanaesthetized cats. It was found that the analgetic dose fentanyl (10-30 microgram/kg) did not affect the evoked potentials. The fentanyl dose of 30 microgram/kg suppressed the resting discharges and responses of Purkinje cells while the dose of 10 microgram/kg facilitated them. However these effects were substantially weaker as compared with those of nembutal. Therefore fentanyl can be used for analgesia during electrophysiological study of the cerebellar cortex in nonanaesthetized cats.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!