Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Chest roentgenograms of 125 patients (115 with pure or predominant mitral stenosis) were studied by the pulmonary arterial angle method to estimate systolic pulmonary artery pressure without prior knowledge of catheterization data. First the angle between the line drawn along the right upper lobe artery and the tangent drawn along the point of junction of superior and lateral borders of the right pulmonary artery was determined. Next the angle between the right middle lobe artery and the descending pulmonary artery is determined. The difference between these angles equals systolic pulmonary artery pressure. Catheter and angle values were identical in 26 patients. There was a 1- to 5-mm difference in 70, a 6- to 10-mm difference in 18, an 11- to 15-mm difference in 8, and a difference greater than 15 mm in 3.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000331977903000905 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!