Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197307000-00015 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Perilymph sampling in Mongolian gerbil, technical note and procedure evaluation.
Hear Res
January 2025
CHU Lille, Department of Otology and Neurotology, F-59000 Lille, France; Univ. Lille, France; Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1008, F-59000 Lille, France.
Objective: The aim of this study is to detail and evaluate the surgical procedure for perilymph sampling from the cochlear apex in the Mongolian gerbil.
Design: Perilymph sampling from the cochlear apex was performed one to three time in 12 male gerbils aged 8 to 12 months via the submandibular route. 11 of them were previously implanted with intracochlear implants loaded with dexamethasone and placed in the scala tympani, the 12th was used to collect control samples.
Feasibility of Self-Programming of the Speech Processor Via Remote Assistant Fitting in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Adults with cochlear implants (CIs) need periodic programming of their speech processors to take advantage of alternative adjustments. However, this requires patients to attend the CI center in person. To evaluate the feasibility of speech processor (SP) self-programming with remote assistance in CI users.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSyntactic Structural Development in Chinese deaf Children Aged 4-7 Years with Cochlear Implants.
J Child Lang
January 2025
Philosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, China.
Using the syntactic priming paradigm, this study investigated abstract syntactic knowledge of Chinese transitive structures (i.e., subject-verb-object [SVO], BA, and BEI) in deaf children with cochlear implants (CIs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparison of behind-the-ear vs. off-the-ear speech processors in cochlear implants: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.
PLoS One
January 2025
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Background: Cochlear implants (CI) with off-the-ear (OTE) and behind-the-ear (BTE) speech processors differ in user experience and audiological performance, impacting speech perception, comfort, and satisfaction.
Objectives: This systematic review explores audiological outcomes (speech perception in quiet and noise) and non-audiological factors (device handling, comfort, cosmetics, overall satisfaction) of OTE and BTE speech processors in CI recipients.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA-S guidelines, examining Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Accuracy and variability in clinical predictions of speech recognition outcomes for cochlear implant users.
Int J Audiol
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Objectives: An improvement in speech perception is a major well-documented benefit of cochlear implantation (CI), which is commonly discussed with CI candidates to set expectations. However, a large variability exists in speech perception outcomes. We evaluated the accuracy of clinical predictions of post-CI speech perception scores.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!