Recently, attention has centered on the validity of toxicity reports for the registration of pesticides. In Finland, a study was conducted to evaluate the validity of the toxicity reports of pesticides done in U. S. laboratories. Twenty-seven pesticide formulations of the 230 on the market in Finland were selected for the study. The material contained 61 toxicity reports of 16 pesticide formulations done in U. S. laboratories considered questionable, 64 reports from U. S. laboratories considered reliable, and 142 reports originating from European laboratories, totally 267 reports. These reports were divided into valid according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guidelines, and included those with minor discrepancies but in compliance with the good laboratory practice at the time of the study (group I), and and invalid according to the OECD guidelines (group II). After a closer evaluation of the 125 U. S. reports, 85 reports were considered valid and 40 invalid. As a function of time, the proportion of valid studies of all studies on pesticides for the registration purposes in Finland increased during 1961-1981 from 47 to 93%, being 100% at the present time. The lack of information of pesticide formulations registered earlier creates a problem to be solved in the future in Finland, rather than the lack of the validity of toxicity reports.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2300(85)90006-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

toxicity reports
20
validity toxicity
12
pesticide formulations
12
reports
11
reports pesticides
8
pesticides registration
8
laboratories considered
8
reports reports
8
oecd guidelines
8
finland
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!