Two adult-size endoscopes (Olympus GIF-K2 and ACMI TX-8) were compared for extent of duodenal intubation by the endoscopist's estimate of location and x-ray position in 55 patients. The endoscopes were not different in duodenal position when separately analyzed for the endoscopist's estimate or x-ray location. Combining the results for both endoscopes showed the endoscopist's estimate to differ significantly from x-ray location in 47% of patients (p = 0.02). When incorrect, the endoscopist overestimated 62% of the time and underestimated 38% of the time. X-ray evaluation of insertion depth confirmed that the second portion of the duodenum was reached in 96%, third portion in 51%, and fourth portion or beyond in 38% of patients. We conclude that fluoroscopic confirmation may be necessary when endoscopically assessing distal duodenal segments for pathology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(85)72249-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endoscopist's estimate
12
x-ray location
8
upper gastrointestinal
4
gastrointestinal endoscopy--how
4
endoscopy--how endoscope
4
endoscope go?
4
go? adult-size
4
adult-size endoscopes
4
endoscopes olympus
4
olympus gif-k2
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!