Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In albino rabbits, spontaneously hypertensive rats, and guinea pigs, cochlear blood flow was measured with the microsphere method, using radioactively labelled microspheres technique and a gammaspectrometer. This 'conventional' microsphere method was compared with a new technique for measurements of cochlear blood flow: a modification of the 'radioactive' microsphere technique and the soft surface specimen technique. Values obtained for cochlear blood flow by the two different methods were similar. Consequently, the microsphere surface technique is a suitable alternative to the classical radioactive microsphere method for blood flow determinations in the cochlea.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016488509182258 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!