A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Neurocognitive passport: A novel feedback tool for pediatric patients with sickle cell disease. | LitMetric

Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is associated with neurocognitive impairment, and routine cognitive and academic screening is recommended. Traditional reports following testing are often not health literate, limiting the usefulness of evaluations. This study investigated whether a small "passport" summarizing results and recommendations would be helpful in increasing understanding of results and follow-through on recommendations. Participants ( = 46) were randomized to two groups. Following evaluations, the control group received a report in the mail while the experimental group received the report with a printed "passport." Seven to fourteen weeks after receiving results, a follow-up phone call was conducted to assess recall. Results did not support the effectiveness of a neurocognitive passport for improving understanding or recall of neurocognitive testing results, nor did this approach demonstrate improvement in follow-through on recommendations. However, results did suggest variability in caregiver understanding and recall, suggesting that ongoing efforts to improve outcomes in these domains is important. Follow-up studies should look at other novel methods to achieve this goal.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13674935251326787DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neurocognitive passport
8
sickle cell
8
cell disease
8
follow-through recommendations
8
group received
8
received report
8
understanding recall
8
neurocognitive
4
passport novel
4
novel feedback
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!