A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of Structure and Viability of Block Cartilage Grafts With Ultrafine Diced Cartilage Grafts in Rabbits. | LitMetric

Comparison of Structure and Viability of Block Cartilage Grafts With Ultrafine Diced Cartilage Grafts in Rabbits.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open

From the Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Tambaksari, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.

Published: March 2025

Background: Autologous block cartilage grafts are traditional and commonly used but have an incidence of warping of 39%. Autologous diced cartilage does not warp or require a long learning curve and can be made from a combination of cartilage sources. Ultrafine diced cartilage (UFDC) (<0.5 mm) facilitates cartilage nutrition owing to its increased surface area and reduced diffusion distance. An ultrafine size reduces the risk of irregular graft contours.

Methods: Randomized pre- and posttest experimental studies on rabbits (). The fixed variables were block and ultrafine diced cartilage grafts. The dependent variables were structure, viability, and collagen content 1 month after implantation.

Results: There was significant warping of the block cartilage postimplantation ( value 0.000 < 0.05). Twenty-five percent of UFDC grafts showed completely dense consistency, and 50% displayed dense edges with a soft and easily dispersed center. Weight of block cartilage increased from 1.14 to 3.73 g (0.000 < 0.05), whereas UFDC increased from 1.13 to 2.13 g (0.002 < 0.05). Block cartilage had 17.2 blood vessels, whereas UFDC had 24.3 (0.040 < 0.05). The block cartilage had an average of 235.8 cells with intact nuclei, whereas UFDC had an average of 394.15 cells (0.000 < 0.05). The collagen content of the block cartilage was 33.16%, whereas that of the UFDC was 40.97% (0.000 < 0.05).

Conclusions: UFDC displayed better microscopic viability and higher collagen content than the block cartilage. The structural and functional integrity of the UFDC presents great potential for use in the plastic surgery armamentarium.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903024PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006615DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cartilage grafts
12
diced cartilage
12
block cartilage
8
ultrafine diced
8
cartilage
6
comparison structure
4
structure viability
4
viability block
4
grafts ultrafine
4
grafts rabbits
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!