Background: Contralateral donor autografts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) may act as an alternative to conventional ipsilateral donor grafts but are rarely used clinically because of the lack of evidence on patient outcomes and concerns around additional morbidity.
Purpose: To investigate the effect of contralateral versus ipsilateral autograft use in ACLR on patient outcomes.
Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to October 2022 for comparative studies assessing the clinical or functional outcomes of ipsilateral versus contralateral autograft harvest in primary or revision ACLR. Given the heterogeneity of the included studies, data were summarized using descriptive statistics.
Results: Included were 11 studies representing 1638 patients with a mean follow-up of 49 months. The mean time to return to sport was shorter in patients treated with a contralateral bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft in 2 of 3 studies that evaluated this outcome after primary ACLR and in the only study that evaluated this outcome after revision ACLR. Some studies found improved strength recovery in the contralateral ACL-reconstructed knee. Otherwise, there was no significant difference between contralateral and ipsilateral ACLRs on subjective or objective postoperative clinical outcome scores. Most studies reported minimal donor site morbidity. Clinical adverse events including postoperative graft rerupture and infection were low in both contralateral and ipsilateral ACLRs and were not significantly different.
Conclusion: Contralateral ACL autograft harvest may lead to earlier return to sport when patients undergo BPTB ACLR. However, clinical outcomes, morbidity, risk of rerupture, and risk of donor knee injury were not significantly different in this review.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898232 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671241310808 | DOI Listing |
Orthop J Sports Med
March 2025
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Background: Contralateral donor autografts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) may act as an alternative to conventional ipsilateral donor grafts but are rarely used clinically because of the lack of evidence on patient outcomes and concerns around additional morbidity.
Purpose: To investigate the effect of contralateral versus ipsilateral autograft use in ACLR on patient outcomes.
Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
J Med Case Rep
March 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan.
Background: Ankle arthrodesis is the most frequently performed salvage procedure for pyogenic arthritis. However, its failed fusion rate of approximately 15% has been considered problematic. Herein, we present a case of pyogenic ankle arthritis successfully treated via a two-stage surgical procedure on the basis of the induced membrane technique.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTech Hand Up Extrem Surg
March 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Hand Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Small proximal pole scaphoid nonunions are challenging to treat. We describe a technique for replacing the proximal pole fragment with an osteochondral autograft transplant harvested from the ipsilateral femoral trochlea. This is indicated in nonunions where the proximal pole fragment is smaller than the scaphoid isthmus; the scapholunate ligament complex is intact on the distal fragment, and in nonunions without dorsal intercalated segment instability and radiocarpal arthritis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
March 2025
Centre for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Cheras, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Split-thickness skin grafts (SSG) for wound treatment has drawbacks, including trauma during skin harvesting, limited availability of healthy skin, pain, scarring, and suitability concerns for certain patients. However, "skin cell drop" presents a promising solution. This fully autologous therapy eliminates rejection and contamination risks, while promoting wound healing with platelet-rich plasma (PRP).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Med Econ
March 2025
Stratevi, LLC, Boston, USA.
Introduction: A cell harvesting device for preparing non-cultured autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) at the point-of-care is FDA-approved for repigmentation of stable depigmented vitiligo lesions in patients 18 years and older. The pivotal RSVP trial showed ≥80% repigmentation at Week-24 in 36% of lesions treated with laser ablation, ASCS, and narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy compared to 0% with phototherapy alone (p = 0.012).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!