A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Managing Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) in USA: Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) vs Standard of Care (SoC). | LitMetric

Purpose: Chronic skin ulcers in diabetic foot patients are a significant health concern. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) significantly threaten the health and longevity of individuals with diabetes, leading to severe complications like infection and amputation and contributing to high morbidity and mortality rates. Given the severe implications, practical strategies to prevent and manage DFUs are crucial to reducing amputation rates. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a popular treatment option due to its properties that mimic the body's natural healing process. The objective of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PRPR vs standard of care in US context.

Methods: Decision analytical model was used to synthesize clinical and economic parameters. In detail a CEA analysis was employed using a Markov decision-making model to evaluate patients with chronic DFUs lasting over three weeks and at high risk for orthopedic complications. The study assessed the effectiveness of different treatments, measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and reported costs in 2023 dollars using a micro-costing approach alongside a clinical trial.

Results: The study concluded that PRP gel is a cost-effective treatment for non-healing DFUs, resulting in lower care costs over one year compared to other treatments and cost savings over five years.

Conclusion: Thus, PRP treatment is a promising and practical option, improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. It is an attractive choice for healthcare providers and insurers in managing non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900793PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S496616DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diabetic foot
12
platelet-rich plasma
8
plasma prp
8
standard care
8
foot ulcers
8
cost-effectiveness analysis
4
analysis managing diabetic
4
foot
4
managing diabetic foot
4
foot ulcer
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!