Role of neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma- A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan; Department of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. Electronic address:

Published: March 2025

Background: Randomized trials and meta-analyses have indicated longer survival with neoadjuvant than with adjuvant therapy in patients with resectable or borderline resectable (R/BR) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite the efficacy of chemotherapy, the role of radiotherapy as an adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment for patients with R/BR pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains unclear. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the benefits of additional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with NAC alone for R/BR pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. Median overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), resection rate and R0 resection rate.

Results: This review and meta-analysis included 31 prospective studies, of which 9 were randomized trials. In these studies, 658 patients from 14 study arms received NAC alone and 912 patients from 19 study arms received both NAC and CRT (NAC-CRT). The pooled median OS was 25.55 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 21.59-30.24 months) for NAC alone and 17.55 months (95% CI = 16.47-18.70 months, p < 0.0001) for NAC-CRT. The pooled R0 resection rate was higher with NAC-CRT (83.43%) than with NAC (69.97%, p < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in DFS or resection rate between the two groups. In patients who received 5 or more cycles of initial chemotherapy, NAC-CRT was associated with longer OS compared to NAC (23.30 vs 21.85 months, p = 0.856).

Conclusion: NAC provides significantly longer OS compared with NAC-CRT to R/BR pancreatic adenocarcinoma. NAC-CRT is associated with a significantly improved R0 resection rate. This positive local effect of CRT can be translated to extended survival when 5 cycles or more of NAC are prescribed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.02.037DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

r/br pancreatic
16
resection rate
16
review meta-analysis
12
pancreatic adenocarcinoma
12
nac
9
resectable borderline
8
borderline resectable
8
systematic review
8
randomized trials
8
dfs resection
8

Similar Publications

Role of neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma- A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

March 2025

Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan; Department of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. Electronic address:

Background: Randomized trials and meta-analyses have indicated longer survival with neoadjuvant than with adjuvant therapy in patients with resectable or borderline resectable (R/BR) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite the efficacy of chemotherapy, the role of radiotherapy as an adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment for patients with R/BR pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains unclear. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the benefits of additional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with NAC alone for R/BR pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study analyzed how changes in chemotherapy based on CA19-9 levels during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) impact outcomes for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
  • - Results from 283 patients showed that those who received a chemotherapy change (particularly those who achieved the desired CA19-9 reduction) had significantly better overall survival compared to those who did not have a chemotherapy change.
  • - The findings suggest that adjusting chemotherapy based on CA19-9 levels can enhance treatment outcomes for patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment approaches.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of aberrant right hepatic artery (A-RHA) involvement in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC).

Methods: This study enrolled 474 patients who underwent upfront pancreatectomy or neoadjuvant treatment for resectable (R) or borderline resectable (BR) PC from four institutions. The patients were divided into three groups: A-RHA involvement group (n = 12), patients who had sole A-RHA involvement without major arterial involvement; BR-A group (n = 104), patients who had major arterial involvement; R/BR-PV group (n = 358), others.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study evaluated the effects of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) on patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.
  • Data from 153 patients showed no significant differences in overall survival or positive peritoneal lavage cytology between those who underwent EUS-TA and those who did not.
  • The findings suggest that EUS-TA does not negatively affect postoperative survival or the rates of positive cytology in pancreatic cancer surgeries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!