Objective:  Despite the emergence of numerous three-dimensional (3D) printed provisional resin, there are no conclusive guidelines for repairing them. This study aims to investigate the effects of different repair materials and surface treatments on the shear bond strength of 3D-printed provisional resin.

Materials And Methods:  A total of 180 3D-printed resin specimens underwent six surface treatments: no surface treatment (control), silicon carbide paper (SP), sandblasting with aluminum oxide (SB), SP followed by SB (SP + SB), SP with bonding agent (SP + BD), and SB with bonding agent (SB + BD). Each group was repaired with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), Bis-acryl, and flowable composite resin (FCR). The shear bond strength of the bonded specimens was tested using a universal testing machine and the mode of failure was examined with stereomicroscope.

Statistical Analysis:  The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normal distribution, and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA;  = 0.05) was used to find the effect of independent variables on the shear bond strength. The post hoc test was achieved using the Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) test.

Results:  Two-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant interaction between repair materials and surface treatments in relation to the shear bond strength of 3D-printed resin ( < 0.001). The three highest shear bond strengths overall were SB repaired with Bis-acryl (17.30 ± 0.77 MPa), SB + BD repaired with FCR (17.20 ± 0.29 MPa), and SB + BD repaired with PMMA (16.60 ± 0.71 MPa), which were significantly higher than their control group ( < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between these groups. Notably the lowest shear bond strength in PMMA occurred in the control group (8.49 ± 0.42 MPa), while the lowest shear bond strength in Bis-acryl and FCR was observed in the SP group (7.28 ± 0.71 and 8.84 ± 1.15 MPa, respectively).

Conclusion:  Repair materials and surface treatments play an important role in repairing 3D-printed resin. PMMA and composite resin-based repair materials require both sandblast and a chemical bonding agent, while Bis-acryl-based repair materials only need sandblasting to improve the shear bond strength.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791979DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

shear bond
20
bond strength
20
surface treatments
16
repair materials
12
materials surface
12
strength 3d-printed
12
treatments shear
8
3d-printed provisional
8
3d-printed resin
8
bonding agent
8

Similar Publications

Objective:  The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various cleaning protocols on the bond strength of dual-cure resin cement following temporary cementation.

Materials And Methods:  Fifty-two human third molars were sectioned to expose superficial dentin and divided into four groups: (1) fresh, noncontaminated dentin (control); (2) pumice cleaning; (3) pumice + sodium bicarbonate air polishing; and (4) pumice + 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) based cleaner. Groups 2, 3, and 4 were treated with noneugenol zinc oxide temporary cement, followed by their respective cleaning protocols.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective:  Despite the emergence of numerous three-dimensional (3D) printed provisional resin, there are no conclusive guidelines for repairing them. This study aims to investigate the effects of different repair materials and surface treatments on the shear bond strength of 3D-printed provisional resin.

Materials And Methods:  A total of 180 3D-printed resin specimens underwent six surface treatments: no surface treatment (control), silicon carbide paper (SP), sandblasting with aluminum oxide (SB), SP followed by SB (SP + SB), SP with bonding agent (SP + BD), and SB with bonding agent (SB + BD).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The interaction between integrin αβ and fibronectin enables tumor cell adherence to endothelial layers under diverse hydrodynamic blood flow conditions, particularly in low shear stress regions. Understanding the mechanical binding characteristics between integrin αβ and fibronectin under different hydrodynamic environments can provide insights into tumor cell invasion and proliferation. Here, the adhesive behavior of fibronectin-functionalized microspheres on integrin αβ-coated substrates under various wall fluid shear forces (0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Increased bond strength between aged CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing) provisional restorative materials is essential for reparability. This study investigated the impact of three different solvents and airborne-particle abrasion on the shear bond strength (SBS) of aged CAD/CAM provisional restorative materials, which are milled PMMA and 3D-printed resin with flowable resin composite.

Methods: 3D-printed resin and milled PMMA (N = 160 per type) were fabricated into cylindrical shapes (5 mm in diameter, 5 mm in height), aged by 5,000 thermocycling cycles, and randomize divided at random into five groups (N = 32) based on surface modification protocols: control; non-surface modification, MEK; application with methyl ethyl ketone, THF; application with tetrahydrofuran, Alc; application with isopropyl alcohol, and APA; airborne-particle abrasion with 50-µm alumina oxide particle.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study evaluated the influence of applied pressure on the shear bond strength (SBS) between commercial 3Y-TZP zirconia and self-adhesive resin cement. Five test groups were created, each subjected to different applied pressures: 195.15, 97.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!