Reward prediction-error carries significant implications for learning, facilitating the process by influencing prior knowledge and shaping future expectations and decisions. However, the electrophysiological mechanism through which reward prediction-error impacts learning remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to investigate the neural characteristics of reward prediction-error and its effect on recognition memory using Event-Related Potentials (ERPs). Behavioral results indicate that unsigned reward prediction-error indeed enhances recognition performance, with reaction times being slower in "remember" responses compared to correct predictions. The ERP findings conform to a three-stage model of reward prediction-error, suggesting that physical salience is swiftly detected (N1), followed by the processing of positive reward prediction-error (Feedback-Related Negativity, FRN), and ultimately, unsigned reward prediction-error or outcome evaluation (P300). Moreover, early physical salience signals were associated with subsequent "know" responses, while later unsigned reward prediction-error signals predicted subsequent recognition performance. This study not only revealed the neural processing mechanisms of reward prediction-error but also explored its impact on recognition performance, particularly familiarity or recollection processing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109120 | DOI Listing |
Neuropsychologia
March 2025
Department of Psychology, Institute of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637002.
Reward prediction-error carries significant implications for learning, facilitating the process by influencing prior knowledge and shaping future expectations and decisions. However, the electrophysiological mechanism through which reward prediction-error impacts learning remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to investigate the neural characteristics of reward prediction-error and its effect on recognition memory using Event-Related Potentials (ERPs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVentral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine neurons are of great interest for their central roles in motivation, learning, and psychiatric disorders. While hypotheses of VTA dopamine neuron function posit a homogenous role in behavior (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Biol
March 2025
National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. Electronic address:
Dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) changes quickly in response to errors in predicting events like reward delivery but also slowly ramps up when animals are moving toward a goal. This ramping has attracted much recent attention, as there is controversy regarding its computational role and whether they are driven by dopamine neuron firing or local circuit mechanisms. If the latter is true, cholinergic transmission would be a prime candidate mechanism, and acetylcholine and dopamine signals should be positively correlated during behavior, particularly during motivated approach.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCell Rep
February 2025
Division of Behavioral Development, Department of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8585, Japan; Department of Physiological Sciences, School of Life Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, Hayama, Kanagawa 240-0193, Japan; Department of Physiology, Kansai Medical University School of Medicine, Hirakata, Osaka 573-1010, Japan. Electronic address:
Learning the causal structures of social environments involves predicting significant events (e.g., rewards) and detecting prediction errors for each agent.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrends Cogn Sci
February 2025
National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. Electronic address:
Over recent decades, temporal difference reinforcement learning (TDRL) models have successfully explained much dopamine (DA) activity. This success has invited heightened scrutiny of late, with many studies challenging the validity of TDRL models of DA function. Yet, when evaluating the validity of these models, the devil is truly in the details.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!