Introduction: Surgical residency programs lack structured assessments of robotic surgery. The validated O-Score is an assessment tool for tracking robotic operative proficiency consisting of 9 items on a 5 point Likert scale. Surgical autonomy is one comprehensive binary item. This study aimed to establish a benchmark for the number of procedures and the O-Score sum score to achieve surgical autonomy in robotic visceral procedures.
Material And Methods: This single-center prospective pilot cohort study assessed robotic procedures between 2020 and 2023. Bedside and console assistance performances were analyzed separately based on the O-Score and the calculated total numerical sum of the individual item values of the O-Score. Bedside assistance was conducted for upper gastrointestinal, hepatopancreatobiliary, and colorectal procedures, whereas console assistance referred to either one of the three areas. The study participants included inexperienced robotic surgeons who were evaluated by 2 robotic experts.
Results: In total, 273 procedures were included in this study. For 13 bedside assistants, 273 O-Score assessments were identified, and 62 O-Score assessments for six console assistants. Surgical autonomy was achieved in 50.9% for bedside assistance and in 11.3 % for assistance at the robotic console. Surgical autonomy was positively correlated with the O-Score sum for bedside (p = < 0.001) and console assistance (p = 0.004). The positive prediction of surgical autonomy for bedside (console) assistance ranged from 74% (60%) to 93% (100%), correlated with a range of the O-Score sum between 37 (37) and 40 (40) and a robotic caseload between 19 (17) and 33 (24) procedures.
Conclusions: A significant improvement in the basic robotic performance was observed. Benchmarks regarding number of cases and O-Score sum were established for bedside assistance regardless of the type of visceral robotic operation. Currently, data on console assistance are limited. Monitoring robotic operative skills and skill progression is feasible in daily routine using the O-Score and O-Score sum.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103500 | DOI Listing |
J Med Ethics
March 2025
Institute for Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Informed consent in surgical settings requires not only the accurate communication of medical information but also the establishment of trust through empathic engagement. The use of large language models (LLMs) offers a novel opportunity to enhance the informed consent process by combining advanced information retrieval capabilities with simulated emotional responsiveness. However, the ethical implications of simulated empathy raise concerns about patient autonomy, trust and transparency.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Surg Educ
March 2025
Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Transplant Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Introduction: Surgical residency programs lack structured assessments of robotic surgery. The validated O-Score is an assessment tool for tracking robotic operative proficiency consisting of 9 items on a 5 point Likert scale. Surgical autonomy is one comprehensive binary item.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Surg
March 2025
Surgical Sabermetrics Laboratory, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Background: The preoperative educational briefing is a focused discussion encompassing trainee goal setting and operative strategy. How to effectively deliver the educational briefing and the associated benefits to surgical learning and performance remain unclear. The aim of this study was to extract common themes from briefing templates, examine the impact on surgical education and performance metrics, and propose an evidence-based, structured framework for future implementation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedwave
March 2025
Universidad UTE, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Centro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica (CISPEC), Quito, Ecuador.
Since surgery is a complex procedure due to multiple factors, it is more difficult to rigorously evaluate innovative processes in this field than clinical trials of new drugs. Being able to carry out an adequate study design with all its corresponding implications, achieving high-quality standards for these studies, ensuring respect for patients' rights, and verifying that their principles of beneficence, minimization of the risk of harm, justice and autonomy are a challenge for many researchers and professionals involved in the surgical process. Hence, it is advantageous to have guides that guarantee the methodological quality of research on innovative surgical procedures and that these guides include the ethical aspects involved in each of their stages.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Educ Eval Health Prof
March 2025
Industrial Engineering Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Purpose: This study aimed to validate the use of ProAnalyst (Xcitex Inc.), a program for professional motion analysts to assess the performance of surgical interns while performing the peg transfer task in a simulator box for safe practice in real minimally invasive surgery.
Methods: A correlation study was conducted in a multidisciplinary skills simulation lab at the Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology from October 2019 to February 2020.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!