A Retrospective Comparison of Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures Treated With Locked Versus Backed-off Set Screws.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

From the Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO (Ward), and the Department of Orthopaedics, Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (Parry).

Published: March 2025

Introduction: Excessive lag screw sliding after cephalomedullary nail fixation of intertrochanteric fractures can be problematic. Set screws are typically inserted to engage the lag screw and backed off to allow for sliding. The purpose of this study was to determine whether statically locking set screws affected lag screw sliding or cutout.

Methods: A retrospective review was done at a single level 1 trauma center. Patients treated with locked versus backed-off set screws were compared in terms of lag screw sliding, loss of reduction, and lag screw cutout.

Results: There were 186 patients included. The median age was 67.0 years (IQR 57.0 to 79.0 years) and 56.4% (n = 105) were male. Locked versus backed-off set screws were used in 23.7% (n = 44) and 76.3% (n = 142). The locked set screw group, compared with the backed-off set screw group, had a longer follow-up (4.0 vs. 3.0 months, P = 0.02), had a greater median tip-apex distance (21.3 vs. 19.0, P = 0.04), and did not differ in age, sex, acute varus displacement (vertical displacement of greater trochanter above the femoral head on injury radiographs), postoperative neck-shaft angle, or calcar gapping. The locked set screw group, compared with the backed-off set screw group, had less lag screw sliding (2.3 vs. 3.6 mm, P = 0.02) and no difference in lag screw sliding ≥10 mm (6.7% vs. 7.8%, P = 1.0), loss of reduction ≥10 mm (6.8% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.7), or cutout (0.0% vs. 1.4%, P = 1.0). Patients who had ≥10 mm of lag screw sliding were older (76.5 vs. 66.0, P = 0.04), more likely to have acute varus displacement (50.0% vs. 23.2%, P = 0.04), and had more varus postoperative neck-shaft angles (129° vs. 132°, P = 0.03).

Conclusion: Locked set screws, compared with backed-off set screws, resulted in a median of 1.3 mm less of lag screw sliding and did not affect the rate of lag screw sliding ≥10 mm, loss of reduction, or cutout.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparison.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01196DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lag screw
40
screw sliding
32
set screws
28
backed-off set
24
set screw
16
screw group
16
screw
14
locked versus
12
versus backed-off
12
loss reduction
12

Similar Publications

A Retrospective Comparison of Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures Treated With Locked Versus Backed-off Set Screws.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

March 2025

From the Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO (Ward), and the Department of Orthopaedics, Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (Parry).

Introduction: Excessive lag screw sliding after cephalomedullary nail fixation of intertrochanteric fractures can be problematic. Set screws are typically inserted to engage the lag screw and backed off to allow for sliding. The purpose of this study was to determine whether statically locking set screws affected lag screw sliding or cutout.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Which side should be taken care of when positioning a lag screw in intertrochanteric femoral fracture: right or left?

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg

March 2025

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.

Purpose: We aimed to demonstrate which side should be taken care of when fixating an intramedullary nail with a lag screw for an intertrochanteric fracture under the influence of clockwise torque.

Methods: From 2021 to 2023, 63 patients who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric fractures were divided into two groups: Group A (45 patients with left-side fractures) and Group B (18 patients with right-side fractures). We evaluated intraoperative images before fixation and postoperative radiographs to assess anteromedial cortical support.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Medial lag screw migration in an intramedullary nail combination.

BMJ Case Rep

March 2025

Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.

Intramedullary fixation is increasingly used for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly population. The management of hardware migration and non-union remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons, often necessitating complex revision procedures. We report a case of medial lag screw migration with propagation of a reverse oblique neck of femur fracture 8 weeks postoperatively in a patient in their mid-70s with pre-existing paraplegia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This video article describes the use of a bone-anchored prosthesis in patients with high above-the-knee amputations resulting in short residual limbs, most typically from trauma, cancer, infections, or dysvascular disease. The use of a socket prosthesis is usually unsuccessful in patients with a high transfemoral amputation because such prostheses have an unstable connection and often require additional waist belts for better attachment to the short residual limb. In most cases, a bone-anchored prosthesis results in substantial improvements in wear time, mobility, and quality of life in these patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clavicle refractures after hardware removal: are there risk factors? A retrospective cohort study.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg

February 2025

Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

Purpose: Removal of symptomatic hardware after fracture fixation is common, especially in patients with clavicle fracture. Yet, refracture after hardware removal is a relatively common complication in those patients. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for clavicle refractures that could be influenced by the surgical treatment provided.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!