A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Addressing What Matters: A Pilot Study and Mixed Methods Evaluation of Patient Priorities Care in Four Clinical Settings. | LitMetric

Background: Older adults with multiple chronic conditions face significant challenges with their health. Patient Priorities Care (PPC) is an Age-Friendly approach that explores 'what matters' by identifying values, care preferences, and health priorities, and aligning healthcare based on patients' health outcome goals.

Methods: Patient priorities care was implemented in four clinical settings (Hospital in Home, a transitional care case management program and in two embedded clinics within specialty care settings) within a large academically affiliated Veteran Affairs hospital system. During the pilot phase, the structured PPC approach was deployed through multiple modalities within specialty practices, including telehealth, and descriptive measures were evaluated. During the evaluation phase, clinical process measures related to care alignment were assessed, and clinicians' perspectives on PPC were explored through semi-structured interviews, which were then coded and analyzed for themes.

Results: During the pilot phase, a total of 109 PPC conversations were conducted by telephone (48%), video (35%) and in-person (17%) across the four clinical settings. Participants were on average 80 ± 9 years old, white (89%), and male (94%). Multimorbidity (17 ± 8 chronic conditions per patient), cognitive impairment (39% of participants), and polypharmacy (15 ± 7 prescriptions per patient) were prevalent. During the evaluation phase, a total of 46 documented PPC conversations were reviewed. Clarifying preferences for life-sustaining treatment, modifying medications, and ordering durable medical equipment were the most common care alignment outcomes resulting from health priorities identification. Nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians responsible for continuing care alignment, and seven emergent themes were described, highlighting perceived barriers and promoters to utilizing the PPC framework.

Conclusion: PPC is an Age-Friendly approach to addressing 'what matters' that is feasible to implement in various clinical settings and through multiple modalities, including telehealth. Continuing to expand the delivery of conversations about 'what matters' is essential for developing and scaling Age-Friendly care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19419DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical settings
16
patient priorities
12
priorities care
12
'what matters'
12
care alignment
12
care
10
chronic conditions
8
ppc age-friendly
8
age-friendly approach
8
health priorities
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!