Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is a common autoimmune disorder with significant psychosocial burden. Intralesional corticosteroid (ILCS) injection is considered the main line of management. More tolerable treatment methods with less side effects are needed. Fractional radiofrequency microneedling (FRM) can be used in the treatment of hair disorders. It was reported to stimulate hair regrowth in patients with androgenic alopecia.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FRM compared to ILCS as a potential therapeutic agent in AA.
Methods: Twenty-four patients with multifocal patchy AA were recruited. In each patient, 3 patches were randomly assigned to 3 different treatment modalities; FRM, ILCS, and control patches not subjected to any treatment. Six sessions were done with 3-week intervals. Comparative assessment was conducted utilizing trichoscopic scaled scores of dystrophic and terminal hairs, Severity of Alopecia Tool score, physician global assessment (PGA) score, as well as the global patients' satisfaction score.
Results: Both treatment modalities showed comparable efficacy demonstrated by the nonsignificant difference in trichoscopic scaled scores of dystrophic and terminal hairs, nor in PGA and patients' satisfaction scores.
Conclusion: Fractional radiofrequency (RF) microneedling could be one of the effective and safe treatment modalities in patchy AA. It is a good alternative to ILCS with less side effects.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004619 | DOI Listing |
Dermatol Surg
March 2025
All authors are affiliated with the Dermatology Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is a common autoimmune disorder with significant psychosocial burden. Intralesional corticosteroid (ILCS) injection is considered the main line of management. More tolerable treatment methods with less side effects are needed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Dermatol
March 2025
Centre Médical Saint Jean, Arras, France.
The concept of aging has evolved from being primarily attributed to genetic factors to recognizing the critical role of epigenetic mechanisms. Recent advancements, such as epigenetic clocks, have provided tools to assess biological age and offer insights into aging processes at the molecular level. In aesthetic dermatology, understanding these processes allows for more personalized, effective interventions targeting the root causes of skin aging.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cosmet Dermatol
February 2025
Division of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Introduction: Topical insulin (TI) has been shown to enhance wound healing by promoting re-epithelialization and collagen synthesis. However, there have been limited studies addressing its potential use in treating acne scars.
Objectives: To assess the efficacy of combining TI with microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFR) in the treatment of atrophic acne scars.
Dermatol Surg
February 2025
SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
Background: Facial aging, marked by skin laxity, wrinkling, and dyspigmentation, remains a common aesthetic concern. Few studies have investigated combination approaches to treat these concomitant components of aging.
Objective: To investigate the effect of combining monopolar radiofrequency with fractional nonablative diode laser treatments to improve skin laxity, wrinkling, and dyspigmentation.
Am J Transl Res
January 2025
Department of Dermatology and Cosmetology, The People's Hospital of Chongqing Liangping District Chongqing 405299, China.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of fractional laser treatment combined with bipolar radiofrequency for improving atrophic facial acne scars.
Methods: The clinical data of patients with atrophic facial acne scars treated in the Dermatology Department of The People's Hospital of Chongqing Liangping District from October 2022 to 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on treatment methods: the single intervention group (Group A, n=25) and the combined intervention group (Group B, n=25).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!