Objectives: This study compared a simplified in situ self-administered hearing screening test, conducted with a neckband-type self-fitting device, with conventional pure-tone audiometry. It evaluated the maximum speech-shaped noise level for screening (MSNLS), crucial for evaluating the feasibility of this in situ screening test in quiet environments.
Methods: This study included 30 adults with normal hearing and 30 adults with mild to moderately severe hearing impairment. A binaural neckband-type self-fitting device was developed. The results of an in situ hearing screening test conducted using the self-fitting device were compared with those obtained using traditional pure-tone audiometry conducted using TDH-50 earphones. Subsequently, MSNLS was determined by assessing noise-masking effects on screening outcomes. All tests were conducted in an audiometric booth, with the hearing screening test conducted in the booth with the door open.
Results: Strong positive correlations were observed between the results of pure-tone audiometry and those of hearing screening tests across all test frequencies, with the strongest correlation observed at 2000 Hz ( = 0.793, < .001) and the weakest correlation observed at 500 Hz ( = 0.625, < .001). Comparisons of screening tests results with pure-tone thresholds across all test frequencies revealed differences of approximately 10 dB HL for 80% of all ears. The sensitivity and specificity of the hearing screening test in detecting candidates with hearing loss (>30 dB HL) who are suitable for this device were 93% and 90%, respectively. The hearing-impaired group exhibited MSNLSs, such as 57 dB SPL at 500 Hz, exceeding ambient noise levels in an empty classroom.
Conclusion: The in situ hearing screening test, conducted using a self-fitting device, exhibited reasonable accuracy for self-fitting scenarios in general quiet environments. This test can be used for monitoring mild to moderate hearing loss or fluctuating hearing loss, such as that associated with Ménière's disease.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00034894251325617 | DOI Listing |
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
March 2025
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Objectives: This study compared a simplified in situ self-administered hearing screening test, conducted with a neckband-type self-fitting device, with conventional pure-tone audiometry. It evaluated the maximum speech-shaped noise level for screening (MSNLS), crucial for evaluating the feasibility of this in situ screening test in quiet environments.
Methods: This study included 30 adults with normal hearing and 30 adults with mild to moderately severe hearing impairment.
Audiol Res
February 2025
Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Lynnwood Road & Roper Street, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.
Objectives: To investigate the gain provided by self-fitting over-the-counter (SF-OTC) hearing aids compared to clinical NAL-NL2 targets, the differences between various FDA-approved SF-OTC devices, and potential changes in gain over time.
Methods: Two experiments were conducted: (1) a cross-sectional comparison of six SF-OTC hearing aids (n = 43) and (2) a longitudinal evaluation of gain within five days of self-fitting and four additional time points (n = 15). Real-ear measurements (REMs) were used to measure gain.
J Am Acad Audiol
February 2025
Purpose: Over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids can potentially improve access to hearing-health careand enable individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing loss to self-manage their condition. This study com-pared the usability and performance of a range of self-fitting over-the-counter (OTC-SF) hearing aids.
Research Design: This cross-sectional study evaluated six OTC-SF hearing aids.
Cureus
January 2025
Otolaryngology, HEARS, LLC, Akron, USA.
Objective To examine the adverse events reported in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (U.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
October 2024
Otolaryngology, HEARS, LLC, Akron, USA.
Objective: To examine the adverse events reported in the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA)'s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for over-the-counter (OTC) or non-prescription hearing aids.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed using the USFDA's MAUDE database from January 2014 to August 2024. Adverse events were identified using the product codes (QUF, QUG, and QUH) and the keywords ("Hearing Aid, Air-Conduction with Wireless Technology, Over the Counter, Hearing Aid, Air-Conduction, Over the Counter, and Self-Fitting Air-Conduction Hearing Aid, Over the Counter").
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!