Background: Cancer chemotherapy is a treatment that systematically kills cancer cells but causes expected side effects, known as chemotherapy-induced toxicities. These toxicities are managed with supportive care medications. This study aimed to determine the prescription patterns of supportive care medications in children receiving chemotherapy at a major referral hospital in Tanzania.
Methodology: A hospital-based descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at Bugando Medical Centre (BMC). The study analyzed 104 prescription slips of pediatric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and qualitatively assessed national guidelines and disease-specific protocols used in guiding treatment. Data were cleaned in Microsoft Excel, analyzed using STATA version 15, and presented as frequencies, percentages, and narrative summaries.
Results: Ondansetron (84.6%) and pre-hydration normal saline (20.2%) were the most prescribed pre-chemotherapy supportive care medications. Similarly, oral ondansetron (80.8%) and post-hydration normal saline (22.1%) were the most prescribed post-chemotherapy medications. Few prescriptions included a combination of antiemetics, fluids, and proton pump inhibitors for regimens with multiple chemotherapeutic agents. National cancer treatment guidelines lacked detailed sections on supportive care medications, leaving prescribing decisions to clinicians, while Burkitt's lymphoma and nephroblastoma protocols offered more detailed guidance.
Conclusion: Antiemetics and hydration fluids dominated supportive care prescriptions. Significant gaps were identified in the inclusion of supportive care in national guidelines, with reliance on disease-specific protocols. These findings highlight the need for standardized, evidence-based supportive care guidelines tailored to resource-limited settings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893393 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1444565 | DOI Listing |
J Oncol Pharm Pract
March 2025
Department of Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, 06330, Ankara, Türkiye.
BackgroundOpioid therapy is a critical component in managing pain in palliative care, where pharmacists' specialised expertise is crucial in ensuring quality care for patients. This systematic review aims to document available evidence on pharmacist interventions and their impact on optimising opioid therapy for pain management in palliative care patients.MethodsWe searched Medline (OVID), Embase (OVID), APA PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant articles published from the beginning to 31 December, 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Hosp Palliat Nurs
March 2025
Assisted living (AL) and residential care (RC) settings are experiencing substantial growth as older adults with lower care needs seek alternatives to nursing homes. Despite this trend, there is a lack of skilled nursing care to support palliative care (PC) in these environments. Primary PC delivered by AL staff has emerged as a potential model to bridge this gap, focusing on symptom management and holistic support for individuals with serious illness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Racial Ethn Health Disparities
March 2025
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1202 West Johnson St., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Healthcare disparities persist in the USA, with Black patients often receiving lower-quality care. Effective doctor-patient communication is crucial for influencing satisfaction, adherence to treatment, and overall health outcomes. This study examined racial disparities in doctor-patient communication, focusing on encounters with Black and White patients recently diagnosed with myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer
March 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care
March 2025
Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, East Yorkshire, UK.
Purpose Of The Review: This review summarises high-level evidence for fan therapy and adds a commentary on the relatively-neglected question of how to optimise benefits based on qualitative evidence, clinical experience and broader research and theory.
Recent Findings: Recent high-level evidence suggests the fan reduces time to recovery from episodic breathlessness rather than reduces daily levels over a longer period. Lower grade evidence suggests the fan can also help people increase their physical activity.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!