Background: This randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of three advanced dressings (Aquacel Ag®, Opsite® Post-Op, and Mepilex Border Post-Op®) versus traditional dressings in post-operative care for patients undergoing orthopaedic hip or knee surgeries.
Methods: Conducted between August and December 2022 at a tertiary care orthopaedic centre, 314 patients were randomized into four groups. Group A received Aquacel Ag®, Group B received Opsite® Post-Op, Group C received Mepilex Border Post-Op®, and Group D received traditional dressings. The primary outcomes measured were pain levels during dressing changes, exudate management, patient comfort, nurses' ease of application and removal of the dressing, and surgical site complications. Multivariate analysis, including logistic regression, was performed to adjust for potential confounders (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06540040).
Results: Mepilex Border Post-Op® (Group C) significantly outperformed other dressings in key areas. Pain levels during dressing changes were consistently lower in this group on Day 3 (3.5 ± 0.8 vs. 6.0 ± 1.1 in the traditional dressing group, p = 0.002) and at day 7 & 14 as well. Exudate management was effective with Mepilex Border Post-Op®. Group C patients reported the highest comfort and mobility scores on a Likert scale with easy application and removal. Surgical site complications were minimal, with only 1.2 % of Group C patients affected by Day 14 compared to 9.8 % in Group D (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis confirmed that Mepilex Border Post-Op® significantly reduced surgical site complications and improved patient comfort, with adjusted odds ratios favouring this dressing over traditional options.
Conclusion: Mepilex Border Post-Op® (a 4-layer hydrophilic foam dressing) demonstrated benefits in post-operative care, reducing pain and complications while improving patient comfort. Single centre design with a limited sample size of the present study limits the generalizability of our findings. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings in broader clinical settings.
Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06540040.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891700 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102933 | DOI Listing |
Background: This randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of three advanced dressings (Aquacel Ag®, Opsite® Post-Op, and Mepilex Border Post-Op®) versus traditional dressings in post-operative care for patients undergoing orthopaedic hip or knee surgeries.
Methods: Conducted between August and December 2022 at a tertiary care orthopaedic centre, 314 patients were randomized into four groups. Group A received Aquacel Ag®, Group B received Opsite® Post-Op, Group C received Mepilex Border Post-Op®, and Group D received traditional dressings.
J Orthop Surg Res
February 2025
Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, 15 Karnchanavanich Road, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
Background: Silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent (SSA) and transparent films with absorbent (TFA) dressings are reportedly effective postoperative knee surgery dressings; however, there have been no direct comparative studies on these two innovative dressings over the hip areas. In this study, we aimed to compare user satisfaction and potential complications between TFA and SSA dressings for the hip area.
Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital.
J Wound Care
January 2025
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 510405, Guangzhou, China.
Sweet syndrome (SS), which is characterised by fever and erythematous tender skin lesions, has been shown to be associated with lymphoma. However, there are limited reported experiences on the wound care of SS in patients with lymphoma. This case report presents the wound care of SS in a patient with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK+ALCL).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAust Crit Care
March 2025
NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia; Nursing and Midwifery Education and Research Unit, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, QLD, Australia. Electronic address:
Background: Prophylactic dressings are used to prevent sacral pressure injuries (PIs) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Bedside clinicians are responsible for selecting these dressings despite the lack of comparative evidence.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of undertaking a larger multisite comparative effectiveness trial of two prophylactic sacral dressings in adult ICU patients.
J Wound Care
August 2024
Associate Professor, Lead Skin Integrity Research Group, Centre for Molecular Medicine & Innovative Therapeutics, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia.
Objective: Orthopaedic surgery is an effective intervention for treating the symptoms of degenerative joint disease or osteoarthritis (OA). Frequent wound dressing changes, unless clinically indicated, can disrupt the healing process and increase the occurrence of incision site contamination. Protection from contamination is critical for surgical incisions and, therefore, undisturbed wound healing (UWH) in surgical wound management is vital.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!