BackgroundThe representation of women in otolaryngology has increased significantly over recent decades, yet discrepancies remain in certain subspecialties, including rhinology. Despite overall improvements in gender equity within otolaryngology, the specific demographic trends and scholarly productivity of fellowship-trained rhinologists have not been thoroughly examined.ObjectiveWe aimed to address this gap by examining demographic trends and academic productivity among rhinology fellowship graduates.MethodsThis cross-sectional study examined publicly available data to analyze fellowship-trained rhinologists in the United States, focusing on gender, career stage, practice setting, h-index, and academic rank. Statistical analyses included Fischer's exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, ANOVA, and .ResultsWe included 477 fellowship-trained rhinologists who trained at 31 fellowships. No gender differences in career stage or practice type were found. Despite an absolute increase in women per year (0 to 9,  = 0.65), the percentage of women in rhinology fellowships has plateaued since 2002 ( = 0.001), averaging 21.1% (SD = 10.8%). Most fellowship-trained rhinologists were mid-career, with a median of 7 practice years; 55% worked in academics, mainly as assistant professors. Overall, women rhinologists had a slightly lower h-index than men (7 vs 9;  = .01), but when stratified by academic rank, there was no difference in h-index between men and women.ConclusionThe percentage of women fellowship-trained rhinologists has not increased since 2002 ( = 0.001), remaining at a mean of 21.1%. Contrasting with other subspecialties, women and men rhinologists have similar h-indices by academic rank. However, there are still fewer women in rhinology overall than men.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19458924251324238DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fellowship-trained rhinologists
20
academic rank
12
rhinology fellowships
8
demographic trends
8
career stage
8
stage practice
8
percentage women
8
women rhinology
8
2002  = 0001
8
h-index men
8

Similar Publications

BackgroundThe representation of women in otolaryngology has increased significantly over recent decades, yet discrepancies remain in certain subspecialties, including rhinology. Despite overall improvements in gender equity within otolaryngology, the specific demographic trends and scholarly productivity of fellowship-trained rhinologists have not been thoroughly examined.ObjectiveWe aimed to address this gap by examining demographic trends and academic productivity among rhinology fellowship graduates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Women have been underrepresented in academic medicine and surgical fields. This study aimed to describe the gender distribution in academic rhinology and investigate otolaryngology departmental factors associated with female rhinologists representation.

Study Design: Cross-sectional study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Current data regarding reimbursement trends in Medicare services and the complexity of patients treated as physicians' progress in their academic career are conflicting. In otolaryngology, there are no data examining these metrics.

Methods: Medicare services, reimbursement, and patient complexity risk scores (based on hierarchical condition category coding) of US rhinology fellowship-trained faculty were stratified and compared by rank and years in practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The goals of this study were to understand the trends in recent and past rhinology fellows concerning their demographics, goals, and experiences.

Methods: An anonymous web-based survey was sent to graduates of the 35 rhinology fellowship programs. The survey included questions regarding the scope of practice, research contribution, societal involvement, fellow satisfaction with training, and current practice patterns.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Resection of the middle turbinate (MT) during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has been a controversial topic among otolaryngologists for many years. Some studies advocate resection and have shown improved outcomes postoperatively, while studies favoring preservation show a decreased incidence of postoperative complications. The current practice pattern regarding this subject is unknown.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!