Background: Periprosthetic joint infection leads to significant morbidity and mortality after total knee arthroplasty. Preoperative and perioperative risk prediction and assessment tools are lacking in Asia. This study developed the first machine learning model for individualized prediction of periprosthetic joint infection following primary total knee arthroplasty in this demographic.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 3,483 primary total knee arthroplasty (81 with periprosthetic joint infection) from 1998 to 2021 in a Chinese tertiary and quaternary referral academic center. We gathered 60 features, encompassing patient demographics, operation-related variables, laboratory findings, and comorbidities. Six of them were selected after univariate and multivariate analysis. Five machine learning models were trained with stratified 10-fold cross-validation and assessed by discrimination and calibration analysis to determine the optimal predictive model.

Results: The balanced random forest model demonstrated the best predictive capability with average metrics of 0.963 for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.920 for balanced accuracy, 0.938 for sensitivity, and 0.902 for specificity. The significant risk factors identified were long operative time (OR, 9.07; p = 0.018), male gender (OR, 3.11; p < 0.001), ASA > 2 (OR, 1.68; p = 0.028), history of anemia (OR, 2.17; p = 0.023), and history of septic arthritis (OR, 4.35; p = 0.030). Spinal anesthesia emerged as a protective factor (OR, 0.55; p = 0.022).

Conclusion: Our study presented the first machine learning model in Asia to predict periprosthetic joint infection following primary total knee arthroplasty. We enhanced the model's usability by providing global and local interpretations. This tool provides preoperative and perioperative risk assessment for periprosthetic joint infection and opens the potential for better individualized optimization before total knee arthroplasty.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08296-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

periprosthetic joint
24
joint infection
24
total knee
24
knee arthroplasty
24
primary total
16
machine learning
16
infection primary
12
learning model
12
preoperative perioperative
12
perioperative risk
12

Similar Publications

Coping with chronic periprosthetic joint infection after failed revision of total knee and hip arthroplasty: a qualitative study on patient's experiences in treatment and healing.

PLoS One

March 2025

Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), along with the extensive medical and surgical interventions required for treatment, impose a substantial psychological burden on patients. Given the need for patients to adapt to long-term physical limitations and ongoing medical challenges, this qualitative study aims to explore the nature of psychological coping amongst patients with chronic cases of PJI. A total of 18 patients (8 men and 10 women, aged 55 to 92) who underwent a total knee or hip arthroplasty revision due to chronic PJI were recruited at a single academic institution between August 2022 and July 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Chronic periprosthetic knee infection is a highly debilitating complication. In case of failed R-TKA, with significant bone loss and extensor mechanism failure, re-revision procedures could not even be feasible. The most appropriate therapeutic strategy in these cases remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients who underwent previous knee surgeries can be a challenging procedure both technically and for the complication rate. Conversion TKA is affected by a higher risk of infection compared to primary TKA. The aims of this meta-analysis are i) to compare the infectious risk among patients undergoing TKA after a prior hardware implantation, evaluating removal vs maintenance of the hardware, and ii) within the removal group, to compare staged vs concurrent procedure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The diagnosis, risk factors, treatment algorithms, and long-term sequelae of superficial and deep, implant-related infections in transdermal, bone-anchored osseointegration are not well-defined. In contrast to the robust experience diagnosing and managing periprosthetic joint infections in total joint arthroplasty, osseointegration surgery has only recently been adopted at a small number of osseointegration centers in the United States, contributing to the lack of long-term outcomes. Through the pooled experience from these osseointegration centers, we present a consensus statement on the perioperative management, incidence, treatment, and diagnostic workup for infectious complications following transdermal, bone-anchored osseointegration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Aseptic loosening (AL) of prostheses is a complex and multi-factorial consequences characterized by nonspecific hip start-up pain, impaired gait, or ambulation. The AL of acetabular components associated with femur prostheses can lead to challenges in accurate diagnosis and suitable therapy, potentially resulting in disaster consequence. This study reported revision of in four cases with AL of acetabular components associated with or without femur prostheses after underwent primary total hip arthroplasty.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!