Can empirical research guide clinicians in how to conduct effective couple therapy? While we know that couple therapy works, understanding the mechanisms of action-how and why it works-has been the focus of research for several decades. Using Doss's framework for understanding the key components of the change process-therapy change processes, client change processes, mediators, and outcomes-we reviewed 48 quantitative couple therapy process studies over a 40-year period. The results reveal a fragmented knowledge base. No single study examines the entire process of change, and although several findings show promise, none have been replicated. Additionally, only a limited number of hypothesized associations achieved statistical significance, with neither theory nor empirical evidence adequately explaining why some hypotheses were supported while others were not. Current couple therapy process research cannot yet guide clinicians on how to conduct effective therapy. Until it does, the divide between research and practice will persist.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70013 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Cancer
March 2025
Department of Reproductive Medicine, Puer People's Hospital, 44 Zhenxing Avenue, Puer, Yunnan, 665000, China, 86 18082997667, 86 2121114.
Background: The relationship between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and childhood cancer risk has been widely debated. Previous meta-analyses did not adequately account for the impact of infertility, and this study addresses this gap.
Objective: Our primary objective was to assess the relative risk (RR) of childhood cancer in infertile populations using ART versus non-ART offspring, with a secondary focus on comparing frozen embryo transfer (FET) and fresh embryo transfer (fresh-ET).
Fam Process
March 2025
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, USA.
Situational couple aggression is common; most couples who seek conjoint treatment report at least some instances of aggression. Modern couple therapy research provides support for the safe and effective use of conjoint treatment with situationally aggressive couples; however, many clinicians feel ill equipped to assess and treat aggression via relational therapy. We propose that integrative behavioral couple therapy (IBCT) offers a uniquely suited lens for working with couples who participate in situational aggression.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Marital Fam Ther
April 2025
Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
While African American couples are less likely to seek formal resources, such as couples therapy, that does not mean they do not seek relationship support. The literature suggests that informal or community resources play a large role in supporting African American couples. Yet, up to this point, quantitative research has yet to identify specific factors that increase informal couple help-seeking for African Americans.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Marital Fam Ther
April 2025
Department of Applied Human Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Can empirical research guide clinicians in how to conduct effective couple therapy? While we know that couple therapy works, understanding the mechanisms of action-how and why it works-has been the focus of research for several decades. Using Doss's framework for understanding the key components of the change process-therapy change processes, client change processes, mediators, and outcomes-we reviewed 48 quantitative couple therapy process studies over a 40-year period. The results reveal a fragmented knowledge base.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Viral Hepat
April 2025
Department of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen City, Fujian Province, China.
To investigate the effects of chronic HBV infection on the outcome of in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer and clinical characteristics of newborns, as well as the factors influencing different outcomes of in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). In this study, a total of 3900 couples undergoing IVF-ET were collected and divided into four groups according to the different HBsAg carrier status of each couple, comparing the general demographic data and clinical characteristics between the four groups, analysing the differences in IVF-ET outcomes between the groups, and using multifactorial analysis of factors influencing their IVF-ET outcomes. The results showed that no significant differences (p > 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!