The evolution of spinal arthroplasty, a significant journey that began in the 1960s and 1970s, has seen remarkable progress. Initially designed to preserve motion at spinal segments and avoid complications associated with fusion surgeries, early designs faced setbacks due to rudimentary concepts and limited materials. However, the 1980s marked a turning point with the development of modern total disc replacement concepts, utilizing advanced materials such as titanium and polyethylene to improve implant longevity and integration. The early 2000s saw crucial approvals by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, leading to broader clinical adoption.By the 2010s, cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) had been refined through innovations such as patient-specific implants and the integration of robotics and surgical navigation. Cervical disc arthroplasty and lumbar disc arthroplasty are effective alternatives to fusion, particularly in preserving motion and reducing adjacent segment disease. Ongoing research continues to focus on viscoelastic arthroplasty and the integration of biologics to enhance outcomes, providing reassurance about the continuous improvement in spinal arthroplasty and instilling optimism about its future.Selecting patients for arthroplasty is a critical process that requires careful consideration. Ideal candidates display symptoms unresponsive to conservative treatments, have adequate disc height, and possess good bone quality. As arthroplasty typically preserves motion, it is less suited for patients with severe joint diseases or significant spinal stiffness. This emphasis on patient selection underscores the need for thorough evaluation and the importance of considering individual patient factors.Despite its benefits, the adoption of disc arthroplasty faces barriers such as high costs, stringent inclusion criteria, and the need for specialized surgical training. Overcoming these barriers requires advocacy, improved training, and potentially revising inclusion criteria to ensure more patients can benefit from these advanced treatments. The future of spinal arthroplasty looks promising, with potential advancements in biokinetics, biomaterials, and the broader application of minimally invasive techniques. This ongoing evolution promises to improve clinical outcomes and significantly enhance patient quality of life, offering hope for a better future in spinal arthroplasty.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/8737 | DOI Listing |
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
March 2025
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection leads to significant morbidity and mortality after total knee arthroplasty. Preoperative and perioperative risk prediction and assessment tools are lacking in Asia. This study developed the first machine learning model for individualized prediction of periprosthetic joint infection following primary total knee arthroplasty in this demographic.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Spine Surg
March 2025
Atrium Health, Spine Center of Excellence, Charlotte, NC, USA
Int J Spine Surg
March 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Lusíadas Porto, Porto, Portugal.
The evolution of spinal arthroplasty, a significant journey that began in the 1960s and 1970s, has seen remarkable progress. Initially designed to preserve motion at spinal segments and avoid complications associated with fusion surgeries, early designs faced setbacks due to rudimentary concepts and limited materials. However, the 1980s marked a turning point with the development of modern total disc replacement concepts, utilizing advanced materials such as titanium and polyethylene to improve implant longevity and integration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: Compare the effect of posterior surgical approach (PA) vs direct anterior approach (DAA) on speed of recovery from pain and dysfunction and on intrathecal oxytocin analgesia after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Study Design: Nested cohort within a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.
Setting: Hospital.
Sci Rep
March 2025
Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415 Feng Yang Road, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China.
The interspinous process motion (ISM) method can provide a more accurate assessment of postoperative subaxial cervical fusion than Cobb angle method which is used more commonly in clinical practice. However, the ISM method presents the measurement results in millimeters which cannot be directly compared with the Cobb angle measurement data. We proposed a modified measurement method for cervical functional spinal unit range of motion (FSU ROM) and evaluate its repeatability and reliability in measuring the ROM of the surgical segment after cervical artificial disc replacement surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!