A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Utility of Median Nerve Electrophysiological Parameters in Differentiating Immune-Mediated Demyelination From Compressive Median Neuropathy at the Wrist. | LitMetric

Introduction/aims: Prolonged distal median motor latency (DML) may occur in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), potentially causing an electrodiagnostic dilemma in acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies. We aimed to demonstrate that parameter values obtained from conventional median nerve conduction studies can distinguish immune-mediated demyelination from compression-induced damage.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the median nerve records of 73 control individuals, 125 patients with pure CTS, 31 with CTS and diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy, 36 with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, and 23 with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. All patients exhibited DML prolonged by ≥ 50%. Optimal cut-off values were calculated with receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the optimal cut-off values forming the modified electrodiagnostic criteria were as follows: (a) distal compound muscle action potential duration of ≥ 8 ms (55.4% and 99.5%, respectively), (b) reduction of forearm motor conduction velocity by ≥ 30% (30.4% and 99.5%, respectively), (c) prolongation of minimum F-wave latency by ≥ 30% (58.9% and 99%, respectively), or (d) abnormal temporal dispersion of > 30% (14.1% and 100%, respectively). Using the modified electrodiagnostic criteria and the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society electrodiagnostic criteria to define immune-mediated demyelination yielded sensitivities of 79.3% and 89.1% and specificities of 98.5% and 92.3%, respectively. Increased proximal conduction time and the presence of a mixed nerve-sparing pattern in the forearm did not offer additional diagnostic accuracy.

Discussion: The proposed electrodiagnostic criteria for the median nerve are reliable for differentiating between immune-mediated demyelination and compression-induced damage, even in patients with extremely prolonged DML.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.28392DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

median nerve
16
immune-mediated demyelination
16
electrodiagnostic criteria
16
differentiating immune-mediated
8
demyelination compression-induced
8
inflammatory demyelinating
8
demyelinating polyneuropathy
8
optimal cut-off
8
cut-off values
8
modified electrodiagnostic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!