Recent studies indicate children who are deaf and hard of hearing who use cochlear implants or hearing aids know fewer spoken words than their peers with typical hearing, and often those vocabularies differ in composition. To date, however, the interaction of a child's auditory profile with the lexical characteristics of words he or she knows has been minimally explored. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate how audiological history, phonological memory, and overall vocabulary knowledge interact with growth in types of spoken words known by children who are deaf and hard of hearing compared to children with typical hearing. Children with cochlear implants (n = 36) and hearing aids (n = 39) were compared to children with typical hearing (n = 47) at ages 4 and 6. Children participated in measures of phonological memory and vocabulary knowledge, inclusive of an experimental measure with words of varying phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Results indicate that children with hearing aids and with cochlear implants tend to know fewer words across all lexical conditions than children with typical hearing. For children with cochlear implants, overall vocabulary knowledge was the best predictor of a mis-matched probability and density condition, whereas it was the best predictor of matched condition for children with hearing aids. Children with cochlear implants and children with hearing aids, then, appear to have different underlying skills that interact with the lexical characteristics of words to support vocabulary growth.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.70007 | DOI Listing |
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
March 2025
Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.
Objective: To evaluate device survival and identify risk factors for failure in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) surgery to guide strategies for minimizing failure rates and improving survival outcomes.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on pediatric patients who underwent CI surgery at the Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, from September 2008 to September 2023. Device survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method while independent factors influencing device survival were analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox regression model.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
January 2025
Department of Neuro-Otology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Unlabelled: In India, 7-8% of the population is affected by post lingual deafness, which can lead to job dissatisfaction, depression, social withdrawal, and educational challenges. Despite the benefits, cochlear implantation in Northern India remains underutilized. This study examines the impact of cochlear implants on post lingual deafness, along with their etiology and indications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCochlear Implants Int
March 2025
Department of Speech Language Pathology & Audiology, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA.
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine how the presentation of unprocessed speech, either ipsilaterally (to simulate electro-acoustic stimulation, EAS) or contralaterally (to simulate bimodal stimulation), alongside vocoder-processed speech affects the efficiency of spoken word processing.
Method: Gated word recognition was performed under four listening conditions: full-spectrum speech, vocoder-processed speech, electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS), and bimodal stimulation. In the EAS condition, low-frequency unprocessed speech and high-frequency vocoder-processed speech were presented to the same ear, while in the bimodal condition, full-spectrum speech was presented to one ear and vocoder-processed speech to the other.
Dev Sci
May 2025
Center for Childhood Deafness, Language, and Learning, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Recent studies indicate children who are deaf and hard of hearing who use cochlear implants or hearing aids know fewer spoken words than their peers with typical hearing, and often those vocabularies differ in composition. To date, however, the interaction of a child's auditory profile with the lexical characteristics of words he or she knows has been minimally explored. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate how audiological history, phonological memory, and overall vocabulary knowledge interact with growth in types of spoken words known by children who are deaf and hard of hearing compared to children with typical hearing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomol Biomed
March 2025
Iuliu Hatieganu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Oto-Rhyno-Laryngology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) can result from various factors, including ototoxic drugs (such as aminoglycosides and chemotherapeutic agents), prolonged exposure to intense sound, and autoimmune or genetic disorders. In adult mammals, the loss of sensory cells in the cochlea is irreversible due to their lack of regenerative capacity. Current treatment options include hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss, which rely on residual hearing, and cochlear implants for severe cases, which provide limited auditory recovery while leading to the loss of any remaining natural hearing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!