A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Visual acuities as measured with an automatic intelligent visual acuity chart projector and standard logarithmic visual acuity chart: a prospective comparative study. | LitMetric

Purpose: This study aimed to test the repeatability of visual acuity (VA) measurement using an novel intelligent projector visual acuity (IP) chart (LSJ-IVAC-6000A, Hunan Liangshi Jia Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) and the consistency of VA measurement between the IP chart and the 5 m standard logarithmic visual acuity (SL) chart (GB11533-2011).

Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 53 subjects were included to test the internal repeatability of the IP chart. Both eyes of the subjects were tested three times, with a minimum interval of 10 min. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the repeatability. One hundred subjects were included to test the consistency between two charts. Both eyes of the subjects were tested with two charts in random order with an interval of 10 min for each test. ICC and the Bland-Altman statistical analyses were used to analyze the consistency of the two charts. VA values were expressed by the logMAR recording method. The time consumption for each test was recorded in seconds.

Results: In the repeatability analysis, the ICC values of the right and left eye were 0.968 (95% CI, 0.950-0.981,  < 0.001) and 0.964 (95% CI, 0.944-0.978,  < 0.001), respectively. In the consistency analysis, the ICC values of the right and left eye were 0.946 (95% CI, 0.919-0.963,  < 0.001) and 0.817 (95% CI, 0.727-0.877,  < 0.001), respectively. However, the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of the differences in the VA measurements between the IP and SL chart for the right and left eye were -0.26 to 0.31 and -0.34 to 0.39, respectively, suggesting a certain degree of instability in the measurements of the SL chart. There was no significant difference in the time consumption of VA measurements between the two charts ( = 0.668). In the consistency analysis of subgroups by age, the ICC values were >0.8 ( < 0.001) in the most groups except for the left eyes of 51-70 years old subgroup which had an ICC value of 0.448 (95% CI, -0.919 to 0.841,  = 0.17), with 95% LoA of -1.02 to 0.77.

Conclusion: The IP chart demonstrated good repeatability and overall consistency with the SL chart.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892698PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1447679DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

visual acuity
20
acuity chart
16
standard logarithmic
8
logarithmic visual
8
prospective comparative
8
comparative study
8
subjects included
8
included test
8
eyes subjects
8
subjects tested
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!