The current study aimed to examine participants' localization ability in a simulated road traffic environment using subjective and objective methods. The study involved 40 participants between 40 and 60 years old, divided into a control group with normal hearing sensitivity, and a clinical group with varying degrees of hearing loss. The clinical group was further divided into three subgroups, each consisting of ten participants. Participants were fitted with digital hearing aids and exposed to simulated road traffic noise to assess localization errors and functional index. Aided speech in noise tests and audiograms were also assessed. The study found that hearing loss increases localization error and reduces localization functional index scores (LFI) and aided speech identification scores (SIS). The noise level also affects localization error. LFI and error are correlated with audiological findings. A regression model predicts error and LFI from audiological findings. Aided thresholds were within the speech spectrum regardless of hearing loss severity. The findings of the study suggest that a localization test should be included in the protocol for assessing hearing fitness for driving licenses, rather than relying solely on an aided audiogram. However, the eligibility criteria for issuing a certificate of hearing fitness for applying for a driving license is yet to be decided in the upcoming study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890487PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12070-024-05282-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hearing loss
12
driving licenses
8
hearing
8
traffic environment
8
simulated road
8
road traffic
8
clinical group
8
aided speech
8
localization error
8
error lfi
8

Similar Publications

Background: Children living with HIV are at higher risk for hearing loss compared to children with HIV-unexposed, uninfected (HUU). There is little known regarding the effects of children living with perinatally-acquired HIV (PHIV) and those living with perinatal HIV exposure but uninfected (PHEU) on central auditory function.

Methods: Children aged 11-14 years who were participating in the Auditory Research in Children with HIV study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Congenital cytomegalovirus is the leading cause of nongenetic sensorineural hearing loss. Treatment with (val)ganciclovir improves audiologic outcomes. Neutropenia is a common adverse event, but correlates that predict who will develop neutropenia have not been identified.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Environmental ototoxicants: an update.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

March 2025

Department of Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health Protection, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Limbová 2651/12, 833 03, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Approximately 5 years ago, we proposed the establishment of a new category of ototoxicants: environmental ototoxicants, in addition to the recognized categories of occupational and drug-related ototoxicants. Since the publication of our review, the scientific literature has confirmed the potential for hearing impairment (HI) caused by the general population's exposure to various chemicals. However, the extent of this exposure's contribution to the global incidence of hearing loss (HL) has yet to be estimated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This paper explores the cognitive mechanisms of prospective memory in children with hearing impairment through two studies. Study 1, based on questionnaire results, indicates that children with hearing impairment score higher on prospective memory tasks compared to typically developing children. Study 2, derived from experimental outcomes, reveals that children with hearing impairment perform worse on both event-based and time-based prospective memory tasks than their typical hearing peers, with time-based prospective memory showing a more pronounced deficit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Research on brain plasticity, particularly in the context of deafness, consistently emphasizes the reorganization of the auditory cortex. But to what extent do all individuals with deafness show the same level of reorganization? To address this question, we examined the individual differences in functional connectivity (FC) from the deprived auditory cortex. Our findings demonstrate remarkable differentiation between individuals deriving from the absence of shared auditory experiences, resulting in heightened FC variability among deaf individuals, compared to more consistent FC in the hearing group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!