A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Diagnostic efficacy of nerve root sedimentation sign in post-lumbar interbody fusion patients: an imaging evaluation and modification. | LitMetric

Background: The sedimentation sign offers an efficient method for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis. However, limited research exists regarding its applicability to post-operative MRI scans. This study aims to assess the viability of utilizing the nerve root sedimentation sign (NRSS) and Schizas classification (SC) in the evaluation of post-operative lumbar stenosis.

Methods: Patients were classified into seven groups using SC: A1, A2, A3, A4, B, C and D. The dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA), anterior-posterior dural sac diameter (AP), and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) of each group were compared. The difference in DSCA between direct and indirect decompression surgery was also compared to confirm whether the deformation of the spinal canal will affect the results.

Results: 232 postoperative patients were evaluated. The variance of analysis showed that DCSA, AP and ODI had significant differences among the SC groups and NRSS groups postoperatively (P < 0.01). Comparison of DSCA results between direct and indirect decompression postoperative patients showed significant differences between groups A1 and A2, A2 and A3. AP comparison results showed significant differences between groups A1 and A2. ODI comparison results showed significant differences between groups A2 and A3. Among OLIF patients, groups A1 and A2 had mean DSCA values greater than 100mm, while in the T/PLIF group, groups A1-4 had mean DSCA values greater than 100mm.

Conclusion: Both sedimentation signs are applicable for the evaluation of postoperative lumbar spinal stenosis. We recommend updating the definition of negative nerve root sedimentation sign to nerve root sedimentation on the dorsal side of the dural sac, with an occupying area less than half, and greater than half considered positive sign. Sedimentation sign is mainly formed by the interaction of gravity, extradural pressure, and nerve root tension.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05672-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sedimentation sign
12
nerve root
8
root sedimentation
8
dural sac
8
diagnostic efficacy
4
efficacy nerve
4
sign post-lumbar
4
post-lumbar interbody
4
interbody fusion
4
fusion patients
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!