Development of a generic decision guide for patients in oncology: a qualitative interview study.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Published: March 2025

Background: Many patients with cancer want to be involved in healthcare decisions. For adequate participation, awareness of one's own desires and preferences and sufficient knowledge about medical measures are indispensable. In order to support patient participation, a decision guide for patients with cancer was developed as part of a larger project called TARGET, which specifically aims to improve the care of patients with rare cancer.

Methods: The development of the decision guide took place from 08.2022 to 03.2023. The decision guide is a single component of a complex intervention that aims to facilitate decision support in cancer care for patients. For the development, existing development and evaluation studies of Question Prompt Lists (QPLs) were identified through systematic literature searches in the MEDLINE via PubMed, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases. The decision guide was pre-tested for feasibility, usability, completeness and acceptance with the target groups through guided individual interviews. Sociodemographic data were collected anonymously. An expert review was conducted. The verbatim transcribed interviews were analysed using content analysis according to Kuckartz with MAXQDA. The guide has been iteratively optimized based on the results.

Results: A generic decision guide for patients with cancer for diagnostic or treatment decisions was developed in both PDF web-based formats, based on the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide. It was supplemented with decision-related questions from QPLs for patients with cancer. The pre-test comprised seven expert reviews of (psych)oncologists and experts in evidence-based health information and ten interviews with cancer patients (n = 7), family relatives (n = 2), and one caregiver. The results were coded into nine main categories. The results indicated a good feasibility, usability and acceptability of the guide. The tool was perceived as comprehensive and appropriate. Individual elements were identified as modifiable for better comprehensibility. The target audience appreciated the decision guide as a good support option.

Conclusion: The decision guide is potentially a useful support option for patients with cancer facing medical decisions in their further course of treatment. In the TARGET project, it will be made available to patients and can be supplemented with decision coaching. Further steps for implementation into healthcare structures are necessary.

Clinical Trial Number: Not applicable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02960-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

decision guide
36
patients cancer
20
guide patients
12
decision
11
guide
11
patients
10
generic decision
8
care patients
8
feasibility usability
8
cancer
7

Similar Publications

Resilience is a key feature of ecosystem dynamics reflecting a system's ability to resist and recover from environmental perturbations. Slowing down in the rate of recovery has been used as an early-warning signal for abrupt transitions. Recent advances in Earth observation (EO) vegetation data provide the capability to capture broad-scale resilience patterns and identify regions experiencing resilience loss.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a complex cancer that generally arises in the context of cirrhosis. Patients with HCC have symptom burden and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) resulting from underlying liver disease, HCC, and cancer treatments. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures may improve the management of patients with HCC by accurately capturing the patient perspective, informing prognosis, guiding treatment decisions, and supporting symptom based and palliative care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Despite numerous studies, the factors contributing to clinical success after a lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection (LTFESI) for radicular pain remain unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review literature evaluating preprocedural predictive factors for improved outcomes in patients receiving a LTFESI.

Methods: We searched databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus for studies published from 2006 through 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Role of PSMA PET/CT in imaging and management of prostate cancer.

Curr Opin Oncol

February 2025

Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine.

Purpose Of Review: In the era of precision medicine, the introduction of FDA-approved prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting tracers has revolutionized prostate cancer imaging. These tracers enable functional positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, allowing for precise identification of the location and extent of prostate cancer spread. This review serves as a practical guide for multidisciplinary teams caring for prostate cancer patients, outlining the current approved uses of PET imaging with PSMA tracers and exploring its future applications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Purpose: Treatments for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) such as eculizumab, ravulizumab, satralizumab, and inebilizumab have significantly advanced relapse prevention, but they remain expensive. Rituximab is an off-label yet popular alternative that offers a cost-effective solution, but its real-world efficacy needs better quantification for guiding the application of newer approved NMOSD treatments (ANTs). This study aimed to determine real-world rituximab failure rates to anticipate the demand for ANTs and aid in resource allocation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!