Aims: To compare the effects of low-dose aspirin and clopidogrel on the risk of incident type 2 diabetes among patients with ASCVD.
Methods: This target trial emulation study was performed usingthe IQVIA Medical Research Data UK primary care database, including adults with an incident first ASCVD event who initiated low-dose aspirin or clopidogrel between 2004 and 2021. We applied an overlap weighting approach to balance treatment groups. The observational analogues of intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects were estimated using pooled logistic regression.
Results: A total of 111,292 ASCVD patients who initiated aspirin (n = 78,012) or clopidogrel (n = 33,280) were included. In intention-to-treat analyses, aspirin and clopidogrel had similar risks of diabetes (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95 % Confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 1.07), cardiovascular events (1.00, 0.95 to 1.05), and bleeding events (1.02, 0.97 to 1.08). In per-protocol analyses, risks remained comparable for diabetes (1.06, 0.97 to 1.15), cardiovascular events (0.96, 0.89 to 1.03), and bleeding events (1.01, 0.92 to 1.10).
Conclusions: Aspirin and clopidogrel have similar risks of incident diabetes, cardiovascular events, and bleeding events among patients with ASCVD. The choice between these agents may thus be influenced more by factors like cost, patient preference, or tolerance than by clinical outcomes alone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112082 | DOI Listing |
Curr Mol Med
March 2025
Department of Nutrition and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Science, Gonabad, Iran.
Background: Opium is one of the factors that may interfere with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). This study aimed to investigate the role of opium in certain pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in CAD patients with and without opium dependence on regular prescription medicines.
Methods: Seventy-seven patients with suspected CAD were selected as candidates for coronary angiography in this case-control study.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
March 2025
Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, Hong Kong, China; Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address:
Aims: To compare the effects of low-dose aspirin and clopidogrel on the risk of incident type 2 diabetes among patients with ASCVD.
Methods: This target trial emulation study was performed usingthe IQVIA Medical Research Data UK primary care database, including adults with an incident first ASCVD event who initiated low-dose aspirin or clopidogrel between 2004 and 2021. We applied an overlap weighting approach to balance treatment groups.
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol
March 2025
Department of Cardiology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Stroke
March 2025
Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. (X.Q., H.-Q.G., Yong Jiang, X.H., X.M., Y.W., Z.L.).
Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel and aspirin is recommended for secondary prevention in patients with a minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. However, the effectiveness of DAPT can be significantly influenced by genetic variations. This study aimed to estimate the impact of multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms across various genes on DAPT efficacy using polygenic risk score (PRS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Pharmacol
February 2025
Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China.
Background And Purpose: The objective of this study is to systematically review the efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with stroke.
Methods: Two reviewers conducted a comprehensive search of eligible studies published in PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and four Chinese databases from their establishment to 31 July 2024. The review was registered (CRD42024559047).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!