Tinnitus can increase stress and anxiety and reduce quality of life. Compared to listeners with normal hearing and no tinnitus, listeners with tinnitus (with or without hearing loss) often have greater difficulty segregating competing speech. Previous studies have investigated neural correlates of tinnitus using the P3 component of event-related potentials (ERPs). Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and ERPs were measured in 29 listeners with tinnitus and 25 listeners without tinnitus; all were clinically normal hearing, with pure-tone average (PTA) thresholds <25 dB HL across 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. SRTs for a male target talker were measured in speech-shaped noise (SSN; energetic masking) or with a single female speech masker (informational masking). Auditory ERPs were measured for a 1 kHz vs. 2 kHz contrast. SRTs in competing speech were significantly lower for the non-tinnitus than for the tinnitus group (p = 0.042); there was no significant group difference for SRTs in SSN. Latency was significantly longer for the tinnitus than for the non-tinnitus group for N1 (p = 0.034) and P3 (p < 0.001), but not for P2. There were no significant group differences in terms of P2-N1 or P3 amplitude. Multilinear regression analysis showed that age at testing (p = 0.005), N1 latency (p = 0.031), P3 latency (p = 0.020), and P3 amplitude (p = 0.031) were significant predictors of SRTs in competing speech. The present results suggest that among adults with clinically normal PTAs, susceptibility to informational masking may be greater for listeners with than without tinnitus.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2025.109239DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

listeners tinnitus
12
event-related potentials
8
normal hearing
8
tinnitus listeners
8
tinnitus
7
tinnitus masked
4
masked speech
4
speech perception
4
perception auditory
4
auditory event-related
4

Similar Publications

Unlabelled: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) estimates the cortical hemodynamic response induced by sound stimuli. fNIRS can be used to understand the symptomatology of tinnitus and consequently provide effective ways of evaluating and treating the symptom.

Objective: Compare the changes in the oxy-hemoglobin and deoxy-hemoglobin concentration of individuals with and without tinnitus using auditory stimulation by fNIRS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tinnitus can increase stress and anxiety and reduce quality of life. Compared to listeners with normal hearing and no tinnitus, listeners with tinnitus (with or without hearing loss) often have greater difficulty segregating competing speech. Previous studies have investigated neural correlates of tinnitus using the P3 component of event-related potentials (ERPs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABRs) elicited by sounds in quiet and in noise were compared between unilaterally deaf adults with and without associated tinnitus (UD+T and UD-T). CAEP amplitudes were hypothesised to primarily vary with absolute stimulus levels in UD+T listeners rather than signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), whereas ABR amplitudes would reflect both level and SNR regardless of tinnitus status.

Methods: Responses were recorded at 60 and 45 dB nHL with white noise set to give 0 and +10 dB SNR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were compared between surgically induced unilaterally deaf (UD) adult humans with tinnitus (UD+T), without tinnitus (UD-T), and with binaurally hearing controls (CO). We hypothesised increased CAEP amplitudes from UD+T individuals, and increased ABR amplitudes from all UD individuals.

Methods: Data were gathered from 34 individuals (8 UD-T, 13 UD+T, 13 CO) using a 64-channel BioSemi device.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: In this study, we sought to validate the effectiveness of an automated audiometry system in quiet (AA) and noisy environments (AA-N) by comparing the air pure-tone thresholds obtained by AA to those obtained by traditional manual audiometry (MA).

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 150 participants with or without hearing loss were tested (age: 11-84 years; female: 57.3%).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!