A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Hydrocephalus Renders Ventricular or Subarachnoid Drainage as an Efficacies Cure for Decompressive Craniectomy-Induced Subdural Effusion After Traumatic Brain Injury. | LitMetric

Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with decompressive craniectomy (DC) frequently accompany the complication of secondary subdural effusion (SDE). In cases where cranioplasty is contraindicated, there are no clear-cut guidelines on surgical approaches for managing subdural effusion resulting from DC. Therefore, the authors conducted this study to compare different surgical procedures for patients with SDE in the context of contraindications for cranioplasty.

Methods: The clinical data of 59 patients with SDE following DC for TBI, who had contraindication of cranioplasty and received surgical treatment for SDE, were retrospectively selected from January 2010 to June 2023. The therapeutic efficacy of SDE was assessed based on the dynamic head CT scans performed within 1 month after surgery and the improvement of clinical symptoms. The authors compared the effects of ventricular or subarachnoid drainage (VSD, n = 33) and subdural drainage (SDD, n = 29), which, respectively, serve as CSF of control and direct diversion. Subgroup analysis also considered the presence or absence of hydrocephalus and the associated risk.

Results: This study found that VSD group exhibited superior therapeutic effects compared with SDD group. (75.8% versus 38.4%; P=0.004), with no significant difference in complication (P=0.543). Subgroup analysis indicates that patients with hydrocephalus who directly received VSD had better treatment effect than SDD (93.3% versus 11.1%, P<0.001), while for patients without hydrocephalus, there was no significant difference between the VSD group and the SDD group (61.1% versus 52.9%, P=0.442). Furthermore, in patients without hydrocephalus but at risk of hydrocephalus, the therapeutic effects of VSD were superior to those of SDD(100% versus 14%, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Our study reveal that VSD could be considered first compare to SDD for SDE patients with contraindications to cranioplastyt, especially when patients have a hydrocephalus or risk factors for hydrocephalus.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010819DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subdural effusion
12
ventricular subarachnoid
8
subarachnoid drainage
8
traumatic brain
8
brain injury
8
patients sde
8
subgroup analysis
8
sde
5
hydrocephalus renders
4
renders ventricular
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!