Background: This is a semidouble-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical and radiographic outcomes of fixation of displaced 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures with an intramedullary nail versus a locking plate.
Methods: Seventy-nine patients aged 45 to 81 years (mean 66.5 years) were randomized to open reduction and osteosynthesis with either locking nails or plates. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at 2 years after surgery. The secondary outcomes were the Constant score (CS), Oxford shoulder score (OSS), visual analog scale for pain at rest and during activity, and complication and reoperation rates. The patients were assessed at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after inclusion. Physiotherapists who were blinded to the choice of implant performed assessments at 6 months and 2 years. Patients were also blinded to the choice of implant.
Results: Three patients were lost to follow-up, leaving data from 38 patients in each group available for analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in the DASH score, CS, OSS, or pain score at any time. The DASH score at 2 years was 12.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.8-17.0) for the nail group and 10.0 (95% CI 5.6-16.1) for the plate group (p = 0.48). Twelve (32%) patients underwent reoperation in the nail group, whereas 2 (5%) patients underwent reoperation in the plate group (p = 0.006). Fourteen (37%) patients in the nail group and 4 (11%) patients in the plate group experienced complications (p = 0.05).
Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcomes or function 2 years after surgery for fixation of displaced 3- and 4-part part proximal humerus fractures with nails or plates. However, there were more complications and reoperations in the nail group.
Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884838 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.0078 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Intramedullary Nail Versus Locking Plate for Displaced 3- and 4-Part Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: Two-Year Results From a Semidouble-Blind Randomized Trial.
JB JS Open Access
March 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Background: This is a semidouble-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical and radiographic outcomes of fixation of displaced 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures with an intramedullary nail versus a locking plate.
Methods: Seventy-nine patients aged 45 to 81 years (mean 66.5 years) were randomized to open reduction and osteosynthesis with either locking nails or plates.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of conservative treatment and locking plate osteosynthesis in displaced proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients.
Methods: The study included patients over the age of 60 who were admitted to a tertiary trauma centre between 2020 and 2023, all diagnosed with 2-, 3-, or 4-part proximal humerus fractures. A total of 45 patients underwent either conservative management or locking plate fixation.
Proximal humeral fractures (PHF), ranking as the third most common osteoporotic fractures, pose a significant challenge in management. With a rising incidence in an aging population, controversy surrounds surgical versus nonoperative treatments, particularly for displaced 3- and 4-part fractures in older patients. Locking plates (LP) and proximal intramedullary nails (PHN) are primary choices for surgical intervention, but both methods entail complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFConserve or reverse? Outcomes of conservative treatment vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty in displaced 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in patients over 60 years.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
December 2024
Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Background: The optimal treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in older adults remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare patient reported outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) or nonoperative management in patients over 60 years old.
Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken of patients following 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures treated with RSA or nonoperative treatment with minimum 2-year follow-up.
Clinical outcomes of a novel 'all-suture' fixation for valgus-impacted proximal humeral fractures.
Shoulder Elbow
October 2024
Department of Orthopaedics, Homerton University Hospital, London, UK.
Background: Conventional techniques for the fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures include the use of locking plates, intramedullary nailing, hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder replacement. Valgus-impacted fractures are a common subtype of proximal humeral fracture, but there are few publications concerning the outcomes of treatment. This study aims to review outcomes following an 'all-suture' technique for this fracture subtype without the use of transosseous sutures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!