Objectives: To evaluate rates of nonunion repair, osseous healing, and outcomes in femoral nonunions with contemporary healing.
Design: Retrospective review.
Setting: Five academic level 1 trauma centers.
Patients/participants: This study includes adult patients (age older than 18) seen at one of the participating institutions between 2012 and 2019 who sustained a femur fracture (OTA/AO 31, 32, 33) initially treated with intramedullary fixation that developed nonunion and were treated with exchange nailing for the index nonunion surgery. Seventy-nine patients with femoral nonunion met inclusion criteria.
Intervention: Exchange nailing for treatment of femoral nonunion.
Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome measure was radiographic osseous union. We further analyzed union rates by OTA/AO classification, nonunion type, implants used, graft used, time from the initial procedure, and infection status.
Results: Seventy-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Rates of osseous union were similar by OTA/AO classification ( = 0.48), nonunion type (hypertrophic, oligotrophic, atrophic) ( = 0.52), implant/biologic used ( = 0.45), and time from the initial procedure until exchange nail procedure ( = 0.09). Forty-two patients had inflammatory laboratory markers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentary rate) and cultures obtained during the first nonunion surgery with no significant differences in union ( = 0.29) based on laboratory and culture results. However, a considerable number of complications were encountered (n = 32; 41%). Common complications included reoperation (n = 30; 38%) secondary to recalcitrant nonunion, readmission, implant failure, and infection.
Conclusions: This large, multicenter study with modern implants, instruments, and techniques for exchange nailing of femoral nonunions demonstrates high rates of reoperation (n = 30; 38%), but higher rates of osseous healing (n = 68; 86% healed) than previously reported data in the literature.
Level Of Evidence: III.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888975 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000387 | DOI Listing |
Objectives: To evaluate rates of nonunion repair, osseous healing, and outcomes in femoral nonunions with contemporary healing.
Design: Retrospective review.
Setting: Five academic level 1 trauma centers.
J Orthop
March 2025
International Center for Limb Lengthening, Sinai of Baltimore, USA.
Background: Cosmetic limb lengthening has been rapidly growing ever since the advent of the external fixators magnetic lengthening nails. Similar to all surgical procedures, cosmetic limb lengthening is not risk free. This paper presents a series of complications encountered and treated at a specialized limb lengthening and deformity correction center, along with an analysis of potential risk factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCase Rep Orthop
February 2025
University of Nevada Las Vegas Department of Orthopaedics, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
This case report from a Level 1 trauma center describes a novel surgical technique to remove a cannulated intramedullary nail, broken at the distal aspect, from the femur. We present a 40-year-old male who sustained a hardware failure, breaking his medullary nail at the distal aspect 7 weeks postoperatively while performing water aerobics. The broken implant was successfully extracted without complication, and a subsequent nail was exchanged.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld J Orthop
February 2025
Department of Orthopedics and Rheumoorthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Otwock 05-400, Mazowieckie, Poland.
Background: Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia are uncommon complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, there is still clinical debate regarding the appropriate treatment method. This study presents the case of a patient with two successive periprosthetic fractures of the tibial shaft treated with revision TKA (rTKA) and intramedullary fixation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev
February 2025
From the Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY (Dr. Burns, Mr. LoPolito, Dr. Hoellwarth, Dr. Reif, Dr. Fragomen, Dr. Rozbruch), and the Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (LoPolito).
Background: Limb length discrepancy (LLD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common occurrence and can lead to back pain, disordered gait, and decreased functional outcomes. Femoral lengthening ipsilateral to a THA using a retrograde motorized intramedullary lengthening nail (MILN) is a hip-sparing option for limb equalization. There has been little published on the technique and results of this method.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!