A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Oral Health Misinformation on Youtube - A Content Analysis. | LitMetric

Oral Health Misinformation on Youtube - A Content Analysis.

J Pharm Bioallied Sci

Department of Public Health Dentistry, CRRI, Sathyabama Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Published: December 2024

Introduction: With the rise of social media and widespread smartphone use, information is now readily accessible worldwide. However, the credibility of this information often remains unchecked. Few studies have evaluated oral health content on online platforms. However, YouTube, despite its popularity, is frequently overlooked. This study aims to identify and analyze oral health misinformation on YouTube.

Methods: A search was done on YouTube using common keywords related to oral health through Google chrome browser with incognito mode to limit the bias associated with Google accounts. The videos obtained were subjected to analysis using a coding framework and both auditory and visual content were examined together by two coders to ensure a comprehensive coding process. All the videos were classified either as accurate information (useful) or misleading information.

Results: A total of 72 videos were included in the study, of which about 55% of them had misleading content. About 75% of the videos containing misleading information were created by non-professionals and only about 15% of the videos containing misleading information were created by medical professionals. It was surprising to note that the misleading information had more positive engagement metric (137429) than the useful information (71207).

Conclusion: From the content analysis, it was found that there was a large amount of misleading information on oral health in YouTube. Therefore, it's crucial to address the potential risks of misleading content and to increase public awareness about the impact of following such misleading information.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888712PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1038_24DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral health
20
health misinformation
8
content analysis
8
misleading
8
misleading content
8
videos misleading
8
misleading created
8
content
6
oral
5
videos
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!