Introduction: Microleakage is a critical issue impacting the success of zirconia crown restorations. This study compares the effectiveness of self-adhesive resin cement, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and glass ionomer cement in minimizing microleakage, aiming to enhance the longevity and reliability of zirconia crowns systems.
Materials And Methods: Thirty extracted premolars were collected, and all-ceramic preparation was done. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into three groups (10 each): Group A (self-adhesive resin cement), Group B (resin-modified glass ionomer cement), and Group C (glass ionomer cement). The samples underwent thermocycling, were sectioned mesiodistally and buccolingually, and submerged in a solution of methylene blue. Under a stereomicroscope, the surface of each segment was digitally imaged. A five-point grading system was used to assess microleakage. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney tests (: 0.05).
Result: Microleakage with all the cement was comparable with no significant difference. The adhesive resin cement showed the least microleakage followed by resin-modified glass ionomer cement and the conventional glass ionomer cement, although insignificant.
Conclusion: Resin cement, amongst all the adhesive cement, had the least microleakage; however, it was statistically insignificant.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888738 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_890_24 | DOI Listing |
Clin Exp Dent Res
February 2025
Dental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of incorporating glass ionomer fillers of varying sizes on fluoride release, antiplaque properties, and the abrasive effects of toothpaste.
Materials And Methods: In this laboratory study, three toothpaste samples containing glass ionomer filler particles (0.5, 5 µm, and a hybrid combination of equal proportions of both fillers) were tested, along with a base toothpaste without fillers or fluoride and a commercial toothpaste (Colgate Total) as controls.
Ir J Med Sci
March 2025
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Objective: Understanding the sealing ability of restorative materials to prevent microleakage and its consequent complications-such as secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, and restoration failure-is imperative in clinical dentistry. This study aims to compare the microleakage performance of four restorative materials-bioactive composite resin (Activa Pronto), alkasite restorative (Cention N), compomer (Dyract Flow), and glass ionomer cement (Type 2 GIC)-in Class V cavities of extracted premolar teeth.
Materials And Methods: Forty non-carious, intact premolar teeth were selected and prepared with standardized Class V cavities.
Cureus
February 2025
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, IND.
Objective Proper seal achieved via placement of an effective intraorifice barrier curtails the occurrence of post-bleaching consequences and reinforces the cervical tooth structure. Hence, our present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of three different light-cure biomaterials as an intraorifice barrier. Methodology Forty-eight sound human premolars were obtained, and root canal treatment procedures were accomplished according to the standard protocol.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pharm Bioallied Sci
December 2024
Department of Pedodontics, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
Aim: Aim of the study is to evaluate microleakage of conventional GIC and addition of 1% ethanolic extract of propolis to conventional GIC.
Methodology: A study was conducted between two groups. Group A was the conventional GIC group (control) and Group B was treated with GIC incorporated with 1% ethanolic extract of propolis (experimental).
J Pharm Bioallied Sci
December 2024
Department of Prosthodontics, Clinical Practioner, Tamil Nadu, India.
Introduction: Microleakage is a critical issue impacting the success of zirconia crown restorations. This study compares the effectiveness of self-adhesive resin cement, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and glass ionomer cement in minimizing microleakage, aiming to enhance the longevity and reliability of zirconia crowns systems.
Materials And Methods: Thirty extracted premolars were collected, and all-ceramic preparation was done.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!