Objective: Optimal surgical management of the aortic arch for acute type A aortic dissection remains contentious. We assessed clinical outcomes after total arch replacement and proximal aortic repair (ascending aortic ± hemiarch replacement) for acute type A aortic dissection.

Methods: All patients surgically treated for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution between 1992 and 2021 were included. Study end points included all-cause mortality, distal aortic reintervention, stroke, and malperfusion syndrome.

Results: A total of 357 patients underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection; 76 (21.3%) received total arch replacement, and 281 (78.7%) received proximal aortic repair. The frequency of total arch replacement increased over time (01). In-hospital mortality was higher for total arch replacement between 1992 and 2009 (39.2% vs 20.3%, 03), but became more comparable to proximal aortic repair from 2010 onward (16.7% vs 13.0%, 53). For total arch replacement and proximal aortic repair, 10-year cumulative survival was 64.3% (95% CI, 52.3-76.2) and 54.3% (95% CI, 47.6-61.0), respectively. After initial 30-day postoperative survival, long-term mortality risk appeared lower for total arch replacement (hazard ratio, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.23-1.07), although not statistically significant. No significant differences in distal aortic reinterventions were observed (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.67-2.82). The incidence of in-hospital stroke (17.1% vs 17.1%,  = 1.00) and malperfusion syndrome (28.9% vs 28.2%,  = .90) was comparable between both groups.

Conclusions: In-hospital mortality after acute type A aortic dissection decreased over time despite the implementation of an aggressive approach to the dissected aortic arch. Long-term survival appears favorable after total arch replacement, but remains contingent on early postoperative survival. The surgical approach should be based on the patient's clinical presentation, while considering total arch replacement in patients at risk of aortic arch reinterventions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883763PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2024.11.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

arch replacement
36
total arch
32
acute type
24
type aortic
24
proximal aortic
20
aortic repair
20
aortic dissection
20
aortic arch
16
aortic
16
arch
12

Similar Publications

Toxicity of ACP-105: a substance used as doping in sports: application of in silico methods for prediction of selected toxicological endpoints.

Arch Toxicol

March 2025

Laboratory of Innovative Toxicological Research and Analyzes, Institute of Medical Studies, Medical College, Rzeszów University, Al. mjr. W. Kopisto 2a, 35-959, Rzeszów, Poland.

ACP-105 is a novel non-steroidal Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator (SARM) used by athletes. Its action aims to increase muscle mass and is one of the options in testosterone replacement therapy. Its safety profile remains insufficiently explored, particularly regarding its toxicity in humans.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Bone resection followed by endoprosthetic reconstruction (EPR) in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is rare and associated with unique challenges. This study aimed to analyze the indications, results and factors affecting the results of these cases.

Materials And Methods: Twelve patients (7 men and 5 women, median age 49 years) who underwent resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction due to soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity between 2010 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The favorable long-term outcomes have been reported for total arch replacement using the frozen elephant trunk technique for acute aortic dissection. However, the data on chronic degenerative aortic aneurysms treated with this technique are limited compared with those for acute aortic dissection, and the long-term outcomes are not well understood. Here, we report early and long-term outcomes of total arch replacement using the frozen elephant trunk technique in patients with chronic aortic aneurysms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Traditional total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk requires 2 separate grafts in the descending thoracic aorta and arch, and frequently requires a graft-to-graft anastomosis, which is prone to bleeding. The Thoraflex (Terumo Aortic) device treats the arch and descending thoracic aorta in a single device but has not been compared directly to traditional total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk and has not been studied in a real-world context in the United States.

Methods: A consecutive sample of total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk patients across 5 different institutions between January 2018 and January 2024, identified 438 patients of which 83 out of 438 (18.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Optimal surgical management of the aortic arch for acute type A aortic dissection remains contentious. We assessed clinical outcomes after total arch replacement and proximal aortic repair (ascending aortic ± hemiarch replacement) for acute type A aortic dissection.

Methods: All patients surgically treated for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution between 1992 and 2021 were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!