Objectives: Implantable hearing devices, such as cochlear implants (CI) and bone conduction implants (BCI), are options for hearing rehabilitation in patients with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) and single-sided deafness (SSD). This study aimed to compare the effects of CI and BCI on tinnitus in AHL/SSD patients with tinnitus.
Methods: This retrospective study enrolled adult AHL/SSD patients with significant tinnitus who underwent CI or BCI placement between 2017 and 2023. Clinical characteristics, preoperative and postoperative audiologic test results, and tinnitus questionnaires (tinnitus handicap inventory, THI; visual analog scale, VAS) were collected and analyzed.
Results: Of 33 AHL/SSD patients with significant tinnitus (THI ≥ 18), 16 received CI and 17 BCI. In the CI group, all four VAS scores (loudness, awareness, annoyance, and effect on life) and THI scores significantly improved. In the BCI group, annoyance and effect on life categories of VAS and THI scores significantly improved, while VAS loudness and awareness remained similar. Linear mixed model analysis showed that the decrease in VAS loudness, awareness, and annoyance scores was significantly greater in the CI group compared to the BCI group. The CI group showed a significantly higher tinnitus cure rate (62.5.0%) compared with the BCI group (11.8%) at 6-months postoperative.
Conclusion: Both CI and BCI effectively improved tinnitus in AHL/SSD patients with tinnitus. However, CI is considered the first-line therapeutic option for tinnitus due to its stronger effect on tinnitus suppression as well as the higher cure rate in SSD/AHL patients with tinnitus.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.32090 | DOI Listing |
Laryngoscope
March 2025
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Objectives: Implantable hearing devices, such as cochlear implants (CI) and bone conduction implants (BCI), are options for hearing rehabilitation in patients with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) and single-sided deafness (SSD). This study aimed to compare the effects of CI and BCI on tinnitus in AHL/SSD patients with tinnitus.
Methods: This retrospective study enrolled adult AHL/SSD patients with significant tinnitus who underwent CI or BCI placement between 2017 and 2023.
Front Neurosci
May 2023
CNRS UMR, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Aix-Marseille-Université Centre Saint-Charles, Marseille, France.
Tinnitus is prevalent among patients suffering from Single-Sided Deafness (SSD) and Asymmetrical Hearing Loss (AHL). In addition to bothersome tinnitus in the poorer ear, these patients also report issues with understanding speech in noise and sound localization. The conventional treatment options offered to these patients to improve auditory abilities are cochlear implantation, bone conduction devices or Contralateral Routing Of Signal (CROS) hearing aids.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOtol Neurotol
September 2022
Cleveland Clinic Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Objective: To quantify objective and subjective outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients with asymmetric hearing loss, including single-sided deafness (SSD) whose candidacy was determined on an ear-specific basis when word recognition was 50% or less.
Study Design: Retrospective case review.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!