Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Private equity (PE) investment in healthcare has expanded rapidly, particularly in plastic surgery, where rising demand for aesthetic procedures presents attractive financial opportunities. While PE backing may enhance operational efficiencies, concerns exist regarding its potential impact on care quality, patient outcomes, and healthcare costs.
Objectives: This study examines PE acquisitions of U.S. plastic surgery practices, identifying trends in investment growth, geographic distribution, and the financial models adopted by PE-backed practices.
Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed PE acquisitions of U.S. plastic surgery practices from January 1, 2000, to July 1, 2024. Data were obtained from PitchBook, verified through practice websites and follow-up inquiries. The analysis focused on acquisition trends, insurance acceptance policies, and the geographic distribution of PE-backed practices.
Results: Between 2000 and 2023, PE-backed acquisitions in plastic surgery grew by 4300% in practice volume and 7630% in capital investment. Acquisitions were concentrated in states such as Texas, Florida, and New York. PE investment was prominent in general, facial, and oculoplastic surgery practices, with a preference for cash-only models, particularly in specialized fields. Many practices employed few plastic surgeons, relying instead on aesthetic clinicians.
Conclusions: PE consolidation in plastic surgery is expanding rapidly, driven by demand for elective procedures. While PE investment brings financial and operational advantages, it raises concerns about healthcare quality and equity. Further research comparing PE and non-PE-owned practices is necessary to guide policies ensuring patient care quality and access.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf034 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!