Thrombotic response to mechanical circulatory support devices.

J Thromb Haemost

School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; The University of Sydney Nano Institute, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Electronic address:

Published: March 2025

Cardiovascular mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device use triggers thrombosis and haemostatic disorders, which may become fatal if thrombi occlude circulation or cause embolic complications. Consequently, anti-thrombotic medications are administered, which often cannot eliminate thrombosis, and further compromise patient survival by introducing an additional risk of severe bleeding events. MCS thrombosis is induced and affected by the combined relationships of patient pathology, the foreign artificial biomaterial's surface properties, and pathological flow conditions. From a device design perspective, the latter two may be controlled for and redesigned to minimise the thrombotic response. This review examines how MCS thrombosis is affected by the biomaterial properties of surface roughness and topography, chemistry and charge, wettability, and bioactive coatings, and the haemodynamic flow properties of margination, low flow and coagulation, high flow and platelet activation, von Willebrand's factor activation, and haemolysis. For each property, we explain its well-established underlying biological, chemical, or physical effects on thrombosis, and highlight current and proposed design strategies that could reduce MCS thrombosis. We review the potential reasons thrombosis still complicates MCS devices and postulate that an improved understanding of the dominant thrombotic process occurring at specific regions of devices, and mechanistic insights into the combined effects of material properties with flow, are still required. Together, we provide a guide for potential biomaterial and flow design changes to reduce thrombosis in MCS, emphasising that novel biomaterials and device geometries should be tested under operationally and clinically relevant flow conditions to develop safer future-generation devices with reduced thrombotic responses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.02.037DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mcs thrombosis
12
thrombotic response
8
mechanical circulatory
8
circulatory support
8
thrombosis
8
flow conditions
8
flow
7
mcs
6
thrombotic
4
response mechanical
4

Similar Publications

Thrombotic response to mechanical circulatory support devices.

J Thromb Haemost

March 2025

School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; The University of Sydney Nano Institute, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Electronic address:

Cardiovascular mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device use triggers thrombosis and haemostatic disorders, which may become fatal if thrombi occlude circulation or cause embolic complications. Consequently, anti-thrombotic medications are administered, which often cannot eliminate thrombosis, and further compromise patient survival by introducing an additional risk of severe bleeding events. MCS thrombosis is induced and affected by the combined relationships of patient pathology, the foreign artificial biomaterial's surface properties, and pathological flow conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a proven therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cardiogenic shock (CS). Dual anti-platelet therapy (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Treatment focuses on improving heart function and may include temporary mechanical support when standard methods fail, but this comes with risks such as bleeding and organ failure.
  • * The review discusses current anticoagulation strategies to prevent complications while balancing the risks of bleeding and clotting in patients with CS using mechanical support.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Angiotensin II (ATII) has been linked to higher thrombosis risk, but there's limited research on its effects in patients with mechanical circulatory support (MCS).
  • This retrospective study analyzed adult patients in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (CTICU) on temporary MCS between September 2018 and August 2022, comparing those who received ATII with a control group.
  • While the study found that patients receiving ATII had numerically higher rates of thrombosis (41.5% vs 20.6%), the difference wasn't statistically significant, highlighting the need for more research on ATII's safety in MCS patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) is generally characterized by decreased cardiac ejection fraction (EF) reversibility, less cardiac response to fluid resuscitation and catecholamine, and rarely complicated with refractory ventricular fibrillation (RVF). Once RVF is induced, the mortality rate of sepsis patients will be greatly increased. In this case, we reported a 26-year-old female patient who was diagnosed sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC), presented with RVF for 36 hours.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!